Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland

EN0137: Alfred's Castle  

Sources: Esri, DigitalGlobe, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, GeoEye, USDA FSA, USGS, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, and the GIS User Community

HER:  Oxfordshire 7333 (MOX44)

NMR:  SU 28 SE 10 (225540)

SM:  1015551

NGR:  SU 2773 8223

X:  427735  Y:  182235  (EPSG:27700)

Boundary:  

Summary

Situated in a large natural 'bowl' overlooked by hills with the Ridgeway to the N, just to the west of Ashdown House (National Trust) consisting of an extant small enclosure, 1.2ha, and a ploughed-out large annex enclosure to the N, approximately 4.1ha. A long history of recognition from Aubrey (17th century) onwards, see Gosden and Lock (2013). The small enclosure is univallate with a good surviving rampart and ditch, approximately hexagonal, three breaks through the rampart at the NE (unknown date), SE (Romano-British) and NW (Iron Age). Geophysics (Payne et. al. 2006) and excavation (Gosden and Lock 2013) have shown occupation within the small enclosure concentrating within the 5th-3rd centuries BC (C14 and archaeo-magnetic dates and pottery), roundhouses, pits, material culture and environmental evidence, plus a Romano-British farmhouse dating to 1st-3rd centuries AD. Pre-dating the hillfort are early Bronze Age round barrows and late Bronze Age linear ditches. The large enclosure seems to have been of a less substantial construction, perhaps an annex for livestock.

Status

Citizen Science:  ✓  Helen Wendholt

Reliability of Data:  Confirmed:  Excavations, 1998-2000

Reliability of Interpretation:  Confirmed

Location

X:  -178279  Y:  6717069  (EPSG: 3857)

Longitude:  -1.601511  Latitude:  51.53829  (EPSG:4326)

Country:  England

Current County or Unitary Authority:  Oxfordshire

Historic County:   Berkshire

Current Parish/Community/Council/Townland:  Ashbury

Condition

Extant:  
Cropmark:  
Likely Destroyed:  

Land Use

Small enclosure is extant earthwork (National Trust and pasture), large enclosure is ploughed out and visible as a cropmark.

Woodland:  
Commercial Forestry Plantation:  
Parkland:  
Pasture (Grazing):  
Arable:  
Scrub/Bracken:  
Bare Outcrop:  
Heather/Moorland:  
Heath:  
Built-up:  
Coastal Grassland:  
Other:  

Landscape

Hillfort Type

On slight hillock within a large 'bowl' surrounded by higher hills

Contour Fort:  
Partial Contour Fort:  
Promontory Fort:  
Hillslope Fort:  
Level Terrain Fort:  
Marsh Fort:  
Multiple Enclosure Fort:  

Topographic Position

On slight hillock within a large 'bowl' surrounded by higher hills

Hilltop:  
Coastal Promontory:  
Inland Promontory:  
Valley Bottom:  
Knoll/Hillock/Outcrop:  
Ridge:  
Cliff/Plateau-edge/Scarp:  
Hillslope:  
Lowland:  
Spur:  

Dominant Topographic Feature:  Very visible location from surrounding hills.

Aspect

North:  
Northeast:  
East:  
Southeast:  
South:  
Southwest:  
West:  
Northwest:  
Level:  

Elevation

Altitude:  190.0m

Boundary

Boundary Type:  

Second HER:  

Second Current County or Unitary Authority:  

Second Historic County:  

Second Current Parish/Community/Council/Townland:  

Dating Evidence

Pre-enclosure activity (EBA round barrows, LBA linear ditches). Small enclosure mainly 5th-3rd century BC, minimal LIA activity. Romano-British farmhouse 1st-3rd centuries AD, some Late Saxon activity 9th-11th centuries AD. 24 C14 dates, archaeo-magnetic, pottery and La tene brooch. Horn (Forthcoming) suggests the hillfort start 400-360 BC, ends 350-185 BC, span = 15-155 years.

Reliability:  A - High

Pre 1200BC:  
1200BC - 800BC:  
1200BC - 800BC:  
400BC - AD50:  
AD50 - AD400:  
AD400 - AD 800:  
Post AD800:  
Unknown:  

Pre Hillfort Activity:  ✓  Early Bronze Age round barrows very nearby, late Bronze Age linears re-used as two sides of the small enclosure.

Post Hillfort Activity:  ✓  Romano-British farmhouse within the small enclosure, some late Saxon, 9th-11th century, activity.

Artefactual:  a good pottery typology
C14:  a good suite of 24 dates

Investigations

Long history of recognition from Aubrey (17th century) onwards, see Gosden and Lock (2013). Geophysics by English Heritage in 1996/98/99 (Payne et. al. 2006), major excavations 1998-2000 (Gosden and Lock 2013)

1st Identified Written Reference (1665-1693):  Aubrey (Monumenta Britannica)
1st Identified Map Depiction (1762):  John Roque map
Geophysical Survey (1996, 1998, 1999):  Payne et. al. 2006
Excavation (1998-2000):  Gosden and Lock 2013
Other (2003):  Visited by Hillfort Study Group

Interior Features

Excavations have shown intensive occupation dating to 5th-3rd centuries BC, roundhouses, pits, all major groups of artefacts, environmental evidence. Romano-British re-use by stone built farmhouse. 1st-3rd centuries AD.

Water Source

None obvious

None:  
Spring:  
Stream:  
Pool:  
Flush:  
Well:  
Other:  

Surface

Nothing obvious

No Known Features:  
Round Stone Structures:  
Rectangular Stone Structures:  
Curvilinear Platforms:  
Other Roundhouse Evidence:  
Pits:  
Quarry Hollows:  
Other:  

Excavation

Excavations have shown intensive occupation dating to 5th-3rd centuries BC, roundhouses, pits, postholes

No Known Excavation:  
Pits:  
Postholes:  
Roundhouses:  
Rectangular Structures:  
Roads/Tracks:  
Quarry Hollows:  
Other:  
Nothing Found:  

Geophysics

Magnetometry, resistivity and GPR all failed to show any features due to depth and character of the overburden

No Known Geophysics:  
Pits:  
Roundhouses:  
Rectangular Structures:  
Roads/Tracks:  
Quarry Hollows:  
Other:  
Nothing Found:  

Finds

Extensive finds from excavations, all major categories

No Known Finds:  
Pottery:  
Metal:  
Metalworking:  
Human Bones:  
Animal Bones:  
Lithics:  
Environmental:  
Other:  

Aerial

None

APs Not Checked:  
None:  
Roundhouses:  
Rectangular Structures:  
Pits:  
Postholes:  
Roads/Tracks:  
Other:  

Entrances

NW entrance from small enclosure into the large enclosure is Iron Age. NE entrance unknown if original. SE entrance is Romano-British to provide access to farmhouse in the centre of the enclosure. No entrances for the large enclosure are known.

Total Number of Breaks Through Ramparts:  

Number of Possible Original Entrances:   

Guard Chambers:  

Chevaux de Frise:  ✗  

Entrance 1 (Northeast):  Simple Gap:  Simple gap, not excavated  Undated but could be original into the small enclosure
Entrance 2 (Northwest):  Simple Gap:  Simple gap, excavated, Iron Age  Iron Age, from the small enclosure into the annex

Enclosing Works

Single rampart and ditch around complete circuit, in short straight lengths producing a roughly hexagonal plan

Enclosed Area 1:  1.2ha.
Enclosed Area 2:  
Enclosed Area 3:  
Enclosed Area 4:  
Total Enclosed Area:  1.2ha.

Total Footprint Area:  5.3ha.

Multi-period Enclosure System:  ✗  

Ramparts Form a Continuous Circuit:  ✓  

Number of Ramparts:  1

Number of Ramparts NE Quadrant:  1
Number of Ramparts SE Quadrant:  1
Number of Ramparts SW Quadrant:  1
Number of Ramparts NW Quadrant:  1

Current Morphology

Partial Univallate:  
Univallate:  
Partial Bivallate:  
Bivallate:
Partial Multivallate:  
Multivallate:  
Unknown:  

Multi-period Morphology

Partial Univallate:  
Univallate:  
Partial Bivallate:  
Bivallate:  
Partial Multivallate:  
Multivallate:  

Surface Evidence

Blocks of sarsen within the rampart

None:  
Earthen Bank:  
Stone Wall:  
Rubble:  
Wall-walk:  
Evidence of Timber:  
Vitrification:  
Other Burning:  
Palisade:  
Counter Scarp Bank:  
Berm:  
Unfinished:  
Other:  

Excavated Evidence

Front face of sarsen rows, revetted by chalk bank behind

None:  
Earthen Bank:  
Stone Wall:  
Murus Duplex:  
Timber-framed:  
Timber-laced:  
Vitrification:  
Other Burning:  
Palisade:  
Counter Scarp Bank:  
Berm:  
Unfinished:  
No Known Excavation:  
Other:  

Gang Working

Gang Working:  ✗ 

Ditches

Ditches:  

Number of Ditches:  1:  Single ditch around the small enclosure, V-shaped c.4m deep

Annex

Annex:  ✓  The annex is attached to the N, single bank and ditch (now completely ploughed away but visible on aerial photographs), no obvious entrances but the NW entrance of the small enclosure joins the two. Limited excavation revealed very few features internally, perhaps for livestock?

References

Gosden, C. and Lock, G. 2013. Histories in the making. Excavations at Alfred's Castle 1998-2000. Oxford University, School of Archaeology Monograph 79.

Horn, J. Forthcoming. The dating of hillforts in Britain and Ireland. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.

Payne, A., Corney, M. and Cunliffe B 2006. The Wessex Hillforts Project. Extensive Survey of Hillforts in Central Southern England. English Heritage, 81-88.

Terms of Use

The online version of the Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland should be cited as:

Lock, G. and Ralston, I. 2017.  Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland. [ONLINE] Available at: https://hillforts.arch.ox.ac.uk.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.