Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland

SC3112 Dunnottar Castle, Kincardineshire (Dunfoithir; le Castiel de Dunostre; Dunnottar Rock)

Satellite Imagery

Satellite Imagery

HER:  Aberdeenshire Historic Environment Record NO88SE0007 (None)

NMR:  NO 88 SE 11 (36992)

SM:  986

NGR:  NO 8812 8384

X:  388128  Y:  783842  (OSGB36)

Summary

Entries in the Annals of Ulster for the years AD 680 and AD 693, in both cases referencing sieges of Dun Foither or Fother have been associated on the strength of place-name evidence with the spectacular coastal promontory occupied by Dunottar Castle (Watson 1926, 510-11); a later reference in the Scottish Chronicle alleges the destruction of Opidum Fother by the Vikings (Alcock and Alcock 1992, 267). In 1984 this led Leslie Alcock to excavate an evaluation trench across the earthworks at the NW margin of the promontory. This failed to locate any deposits or artefacts dating from before the late 12th century, and while accepting that the evidence of a small evaluation trench on a promontory that extends to some 1.5ha was hardly conclusive, Alcock went on to consider the possibility that the identification with this promontory was skewed by the presence of the medieval castle. Rather than Dunottar Castle, he raised the possibility that the Annals were referring to the Bowduns promontory, on the opposite side of Castlehaven Bay, overlooking Dunnicaer with its Pictish symbol stones (Atlas No. 3111), which he suggested was an early medieval cult focus. The Bowduns promontory is linked to the mainland by a broad natural gully across a narrow isthmus, and a bank in the bottom of this gully is annotated 'Rampart' in Gothic script on the 1st edition OS 25-inch map (Kincardine 1868, sheet 17.8), an attribution that was omitted from later editions of the maps. Inspection by both the OS and RCAHMS investigators of this bank and a bank extending round the margin of the headland to enclose about 2.6ha suggests they are no more than agricultural boundaries; indeed, the whole of the summit area of the promontory has been cultivated. Comparatively speaking, the rather more spectacular, and naturally defensible promontory occupied by the castle, linked to the coastal cliffs by no more than a narrow spine of rock, is a far more likely position for an early medieval stronghold, and it would be extraordinary if such a site was not occupied in preference to Bowduns.

Status

Citizen Science:  

Reliability of Data:  Unconfirmed

Reliability of Interpretation:  Unconfirmed

Location

X:  -244541  Y:  7749039  (EPSG: 3857)

Longitude:  -2.1967529276084066  Latitude:  56.945751376817206  (EPSG:4326)

Country:  Scotland

Current County or Unitary Authority:  Aberdeenshire

Historic County:  Kincardineshire

Current Parish/Community/Council/Townland:  Dunnottar

Monument Condition

None

Condition:
Extant  
Cropmark  
Likely Destroyed  

Land Use

None

Current Use:
Woodland  
Commercial Forestry Plantation  
Parkland  
Pasture (Grazing)  
Arable  
Scrub/Bracken  
Bare Outcrop  
Heather/Moorland  
Heath  
Built-up  
Coastal Grassland  
Other  

Landscape

Hillfort Type

None

Type:
Contour Fort  
Partial Contour Fort  
Promontory Fort  
Hillslope Fort  
Level Terrain Fort  
Marsh Fort  
Multiple Enclosure Fort  

Topographic Position

Position:
Hilltop  
Coastal Promontory  
Inland Promontory  
Valley Bottom  
Knoll/Hillock/Outcrop  
Ridge  
Cliff/Plateau-edge/Scarp  
Hillslope  
Lowland  
Spur  

Dominant Topographic Feature:  None

Aspect:
North  
Northeast  
East  
Southeast  
South  
Southwest  
West  
Northwest  
Level  

Altitude:  30.0m

Boundary

N/A


Dating Evidence

Entries in the Annals of Ulster and the Scottish Chronicle suggest the presence of an early medieval stronghold beneath the medieval castle.

Reliability:  D - None

Principal Activity:
Pre 1200BC  
1200BC - 800BC  
800BC - 400BC  
400BC - AD50  
AD50 - AD400  
AD400 - AD 800  
Post AD800  
Unknown  

Other Activity:
Pre Hillfort:   None
Post Hillfort:   None

Evidence:
Other:   Documentary

Investigation History

RCAHMS hold an extensive collection of aerial photographs and other records relating to the castle, not otherwise referenced here.

Investigations:
1st Identified Written Reference (1926):   Place-name identification (Watson 1926, 510-11)
Earthwork Survey (1930):   Plan of the castle by Pat Watson (RCAHMS KCD 28/1 & DP160547)
Other (1969):   Resurveyed at 1:2500 by the OS
Other (1970):   Scheduled
Excavation (1984):   Evaluation by Leslie Alcock (Foster et al 1985; Alcock and Alcock 1992, 267-82)

Interior Features

Occupied by the castle and its works

Water Source

The Castle has a well, but there is no reason to believe that this is an earlier feature

Source:
None  
Spring  
Stream  
Pool  
Flush  
Well  
Other  

Surface

None

Interior Features (Surface):
No Known Features  
Round Stone Structures  
Rectangular Stone Structures  
Curvilinear Platforms  
Other Roundhouse Evidence  
Pits  
Quarry Hollows  
Other  

Excavation

None

Interior Features (Excavation):
No Known Excavation  
Pits  
Postholes  
Roundhouses  
Rectangular Structures  
Roads/Tracks  
Quarry Hollows  
Other  
Nothing Found  

Geophysics

None

Interior Features (Geophysics):
No Known Geophysics  
Pits  
Roundhouses  
Rectangular Structures  
Roads/Tracks  
Quarry Hollows  
Other  
Nothing Found  

Finds

None

Interior (Finds):
No Known Finds  
Pottery  
Metal  
Metalworking  
Human Bones  
Animal Bones  
Lithics  
Environmental  
Other  

Aerial

NO APPARENT FEATURES

Interior Features (Aerial):
APs Not Checked  
None  
Roundhouses  
Rectangular Structures  
Pits  
Postholes  
Roads/Tracks  
Other  

Entrances

See main summary

Total Number of Breaks Through Ramparts:  
0:   None

Number of Possible Original Entrances:  
2:   Presumably via the rock spine on the W

Guard Chambers:  

Chevaux de Frise:  

Entrances:No related records

Enclosing Works

None recorded

Enclosed Area:
Area 1:   Noneha.
Total:   Noneha.

Total Footprint Area:  1.5ha.

Ramparts

None

Multi-period Enclosure System:
✗   This measurement includes the grass-grown upper parts of the promontory, but not the bare rock going down to the sea on the E

Ramparts Form a Continuous Circuit:
✗   Unknown

Number of Ramparts:  
NE Quadrant:   0
SE Quadrant:   0
SW Quadrant:   0
NW Quadrant:   0
Total:   0

Morphology

Current Morphology:
Partial Univallate  
Univallate  
Partial Bivallate  
Bivallate  
Partial Multivallate  
Multivallate  
Unknown  

Detailed Morphology:
Partial Univallate  
Univallate  
Partial Bivallate  
Bivallate  
Partial Multivallate  
Multivallate  

Surface Evidence

None

Enclosing Works (Surface):
None  
Earthen Bank  
Stone Wall  
Rubble  
Wall-walk  
Evidence of Timber  
Vitrification  
Other Burning  
Palisade  
Counter Scarp Bank  
Berm  
Unfinished  
Other  

Excavated Evidence

None

Enclosing Works (Excavation):
None  
Earthen Bank  
Stone Wall  
Murus Duplex  
Timber-framed  
Timber-laced  
Vitrification  
Other Burning  
Palisade  
Counter Scarp Bank  
Berm  
Unfinished  
No Known Excavation  
Other  

Other

Gang Working:
✗   None

Ditches:
✗   None

Number of Ditches:  None

Annex:
✗   None

References

Alcock, L (1981) 'Early historic fortifications in Scotland'. In Guilbert, G (ed.) Hill-fort studies: essays for A H A Hogg. Leicester

Alcock and Alcock, L and E A (1992) 'Reconnaissance excavations on Early Historic fortifications and other royal sites in Scotland, 1974-84; A, Excavations and other fieldwork at Forteviot, Perthshire, 1981; B, Excavations at Urquhart Castle, Inverness-shire, 1983; C, Excavations at Dunnottar, Kincardineshire, 1984'. Proc Soc Antiq Scot 122 (1992), 215-87

Foster, Driscoll and Alcock, S M, S T and L. (1985) Excavations at Urquhart and Dunnottar Castles, 1983 and 1984: interim reports. Glasgow



Terms of Use

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 and should be cited as:

Lock, Gary and Ralston, Ian. 2024. Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland. Available at: https://hillforts.arch.ox.ac.uk


Document Version 1.1