Scroll left/right to view further images.
HER:  Scottish Borders 55300 (None)
NMR:  NT 51 SE 10 (55300)
SM:  2173
NGR:  NT 5950 1170
X:  359500  Y:  611700  (OSGB36)
A complex fortification is situated on the summit of Bonchester Hill, which overlooks Bonchester Bridge from the E and presents rugged crag around its southern flank. Two episodes of excavation have occurred here, in 1906 (Curle 1910) and 1950 (Piggott 1950), but it would be unwise to think that either the complexity or the chronology of the sequence are understood. The sequence adopted in the RCAHMS County Inventory (RCAHMS 1956, 150-2, no.277) was worked out in co-operation with the more recent excavator, Mrs C M Piggott, and places the innermost enclosure on the hill first, though it should be noted that Mrs Piggott recognised evidence of earlier occupation beneath its wall where it was sectioned on both the N and W. Measuring from 3m to 3.6m in thickness, this wall enclosed an oval area measuring 105m from N to S by 85m transversely (0.67ha); the W section, however suggested that the surviving outer face rested on an earlier bank of rubble, beneath the inner edge of which, and resting on the traces of earlier occupation, the upper stone of a rotary quern was discovered. This may provide a terminus post quem for both phases of the circuit here in the late Iron Age. Further complexity was uncovered immediately outside the wall of the inner enclosure on the N, where two lines of ramparts were uncovered, of which only the outer could be traced laterally, extending down to an entrance on the cliff-edge to the E; considered outworks to provide additional protection on this flank, this is a patently naive interpretation, and the section revealed that the inner of them had been built across an earlier paved surface. Notable features of the inner enclosure are its three entrances, on the N, E and SW respectively, each displaying an unusual degree of elaboration. At the E entrance a track climbs obliquely up the slope from the gap in the outer rampart noted above, exposing the approaching visitor's left side, but where the track turns in through the entrance itself, the N terminal also turns inwards, at this point exposing the visitor's right side. In contrast, both terminals of the N entrance are turned inwards, while at the S entrance they are simply staggered to expose the visitor's right side. The outer defences are no less complex and for the purposes of description can be divided into three elements, namely an inner enclosure of some 1.6ha, an outer enclosure of 2.6ha taking in the N and W slopes above the cliff-line, and further ramparts below the cliff-line on the SE that extend the overall footprint of the fortifications by a further 1ha. The perimeter of the inner these enclosures, varied in the different sections cut across it, from a bank of soil on the N to an unstructured mound of large boulders on the W, while nearby on this side an outer face of orthostatic slabs set below horizontally coursed slabs was revealed, a form of construction that was only known to Mrs Piggott in what she considered to be early medieval contexts; no reliance can be placed upon this chronology today. Like the other ramparts, those of the outer circuit vary in character from cutting to cutting, from a single faced wall on the W to a two period construction of double ramparts and ditches on the N; the earlier phase was a simple dump, sealed beneath a turf-line in both ramparts, while in the second the inner was faced on either side and surmounted by a double row of posts driven into its crest. There appear to have been numerous entrances through these outer defences, though it is difficult on the information available to distinguish between original gaps and later breaks. Nevertheless, there are probably entrances through the inner of the outer enclosures on the NNE, ENE and WSW, while the plan published by Mrs Piggott shows another four gaps in the circuit on the NW quarter, and of the eight shown in the outer, those on the N, NNE, ENE W, and NW are likely to be original. The outer of the two lines below the cliff-edge also has a well-defined entrance on the SSE, though how these ramparts and ditches relate to the rest of the defences is quite unknown. No fewer than twenty-eight round-houses can be identified within the interior of the fort, most of them with stone founded walls and likely to be of late iron Age date; while Mrs Piggott asserted that several were contemporary with adjacent ramparts, where a relationship is in evidence they more typically overlie the defences.
Citizen Science:  ✗
Reliability of Data:  Confirmed
Reliability of Interpretation:  Confirmed
X:  -293995  Y:  7439417  (EPSG: 3857)
Longitude:  -2.641005949676555  Latitude:  55.39759713400711  (EPSG:4326)
Country:  Scotland
Current County or Unitary Authority:  Scottish Borders
Historic County:  Roxburghshire
Current Parish/Community/Council/Townland:  Hobkirk
None
Extant   | ✓ |
Cropmark   | ✗ |
Likely Destroyed   | ✗ |
None
Woodland   | ✗ |
Commercial Forestry Plantation   | ✗ |
Parkland   | ✗ |
Pasture (Grazing)   | ✓ |
Arable   | ✗ |
Scrub/Bracken   | ✗ |
Bare Outcrop   | ✗ |
Heather/Moorland   | ✓ |
Heath   | ✗ |
Built-up   | ✗ |
Coastal Grassland   | ✗ |
Other   | ✗ |
The multiple enclosures are probably the result of different periods of construction than a contemporary scheme
Contour Fort   | ✓ |
Partial Contour Fort   | ✗ |
Promontory Fort   | ✗ |
Hillslope Fort   | ✗ |
Level Terrain Fort   | ✗ |
Marsh Fort   | ✗ |
Multiple Enclosure Fort   | ✓ |
Hilltop   | ✓ |
Coastal Promontory   | ✗ |
Inland Promontory   | ✗ |
Valley Bottom   | ✗ |
Knoll/Hillock/Outcrop   | ✗ |
Ridge   | ✗ |
Cliff/Plateau-edge/Scarp   | ✗ |
Hillslope   | ✗ |
Lowland   | ✗ |
Spur   | ✗ |
Dominant Topographic Feature:  None
North   | ✗ |
Northeast   | ✗ |
East   | ✗ |
Southeast   | ✗ |
South   | ✗ |
Southwest   | ✗ |
West   | ✗ |
Northwest   | ✗ |
Level   | ✓ |
Altitude:  323.0m
N/A
While the absence of Roman goods led C M Piggott to consider the occupation of the fort to have been pre and post Roman, the blue glass bead can no longer be regarded as diagnostically early medieval (Harding 2004, 204). Nevertheless, the the crook-headed pin recovered by Alexander Curle, the spring from a La Tene 1c brooch (Harding 2004, 57) and the presence of saddle querns are likely to fall in the middle to late Iron Age.
Reliability:  D - None
Pre 1200BC   | ✗ |
1200BC - 800BC   | ✗ |
800BC - 400BC   | ✓ |
400BC - AD50   | ✓ |
AD50 - AD400   | ✗ |
AD400 - AD 800   | ✗ |
Post AD800   | ✗ |
Unknown   | ✗ |
Pre Hillfort:   | None |
Post Hillfort:   | None |
Artefactual:   | Ring-headed pin, the spring from a La Tene 1c brooch and saddle querns indicate an early Iron Age occupation (Harding 2004, 57), and a blue glass bead considered by Piggott to be early medieval can no longer be regarded as diagnostic (Harding 2004, 204) |
Photographed from the air by CUCAP in 1949, Dennis Harding in 1982, and by RCAHMS Aerial Survey Programme in 1992, 1997 and 2010
1st Identified Map Depiction (1770):   | Shown on Mathew Stobie's A map of Roxburghshire or Tiviotdale (1770) |
1st Identified Written Reference (1836):   | Noted (NSA, 3, Roxburghshire, 212) |
Other (1858):   | Annotated Fort on the 1st edition OS 25-inch map (Roxburgh 1863, sheet 26.11) |
Earthwork Survey (1906):   | Plan for the excavations drawn by Thomas Ross, but incomplete (Curle 1910, 228, fig 1) |
Excavation (1906):   | Directed by Alexander Curle (1910) |
Earthwork Survey (1950):   | Surveyed by RCAHMS for the excavation plan (RCAHMS 1956, 150-2, no.277; RCAHMS RXD 115/5 & 8) |
Excavation (1950):   | Directed by Mrs C M Piggott (1950; Archive RCAHMS 551 261/1/7) |
Other (1961):   | Scheduled |
Other (1965):   | Resurveyed at 1:2500 by the OS |
At least twenty-eight round-houses identified on the plan, of which the majority are stone founded.
None
None   | ✓ |
Spring   | ✗ |
Stream   | ✗ |
Pool   | ✗ |
Flush   | ✗ |
Well   | ✗ |
Other   | ✗ |
None
No Known Features   | ✗ |
Round Stone Structures   | ✓ |
Rectangular Stone Structures   | ✗ |
Curvilinear Platforms   | ✗ |
Other Roundhouse Evidence   | ✗ |
Pits   | ✗ |
Quarry Hollows   | ✗ |
Other   | ✗ |
None
No Known Excavation   | ✗ |
Pits   | ✗ |
Postholes   | ✗ |
Roundhouses   | ✓ |
Rectangular Structures   | ✗ |
Roads/Tracks   | ✗ |
Quarry Hollows   | ✗ |
Other   | ✗ |
Nothing Found   | ✗ |
None
No Known Geophysics   | ✓ |
Pits   | ✗ |
Roundhouses   | ✗ |
Rectangular Structures   | ✗ |
Roads/Tracks   | ✗ |
Quarry Hollows   | ✗ |
Other   | ✗ |
Nothing Found   | ✗ |
Finds include, coarse pottery sherds, an iron crook-headed pin, the spring from a La Tene 1c brooch, a blue glass bead, a stone bead, two perforated stone discs, two small stone balls, and both saddle querns rotary querns. A fragment of a shale armlet is also marked upon the section drawing of Cutting 1 (Piggott 1950, fig 5)
No Known Finds   | ✗ |
Pottery   | ✓ |
Metal   | ✓ |
Metalworking   | ✗ |
Human Bones   | ✗ |
Animal Bones   | ✗ |
Lithics   | ✓ |
Environmental   | ✗ |
Other   | ✓ |
Many of the round-houses are visible
APs Not Checked   | ✗ |
None   | ✗ |
Roundhouses   | ✓ |
Rectangular Structures   | ✗ |
Pits   | ✗ |
Postholes   | ✗ |
Roads/Tracks   | ✗ |
Other   | ✗ |
See main summary
19:   | None |
2:   | Multiple entrances and gaps through the inner and outer circuits, but with little evidence of any relationships between them |
Guard Chambers:  ✗
Chevaux de Frise:  ✗
1. In-turned (North):   | Through the innermost wall |
2. Oblique (East):   | Through the innermost wall, one side turning inwards. Oblique approach exposing left side |
3. Oblique (South west):   | Staggered terminals through the innermost wall, exposing the right side |
4. Simple Gap (East):   | Almost certainly an entrance where the wall of the inner of the outer enclosures terminates |
5. Simple Gap (North east):   | in the inner of the outer enclosures, immediately within a gap in the outer lines |
6. Simple Gap (South west):   | In the inner of the outer enclosures |
7. Simple Gap (North):   | Immediately E of a second gap in the outermost enclosure, which appears a more recent break |
8. Simple Gap (North east):   | Through the outermost ramparts and dug by both Curle and Mrs Piggott |
9. Simple Gap (East):   | A broad gap approached obliquely by traces of a trackway |
10. Simple Gap (West):   | in the outermost rampart |
11. Simple Gap (North west):   | The E of two gaps in the outermost rampart, the other appearing to be on the line of a later path |
12. Simple Gap (South):   | Through the outermost rampart below the cliff-line on the SE quarter |
A complex succession of walls and ramparts encircling the hill, but with no clear evidence of either chronology or sequence.
Area 1:   | 0.67ha. |
Area 2:   | 1.6ha. |
Area 3:   | 2.6ha. |
Area 4:   | 3.6ha. |
Total:   | 3.6ha. |
Total Footprint Area:  3.6ha.
None
✓   | Evidently multiperiod and complex, but without clear evidence of stratigraphic relationships to reveal the sequence. |
✓   | None |
NE Quadrant:   | 6 |
SE Quadrant:   | 3 |
SW Quadrant:   | 4 |
NW Quadrant:   | 3 |
Total:   | 6 |
Partial Univallate   | ✗ |
Univallate   | ✗ |
Partial Bivallate   | ✗ |
Bivallate   | ✗ |
Partial Multivallate   | ✗ |
Multivallate   | ✓ |
Unknown   | ✗ |
Partial Univallate   | ✗ |
Univallate   | ✓ |
Partial Bivallate   | ✗ |
Bivallate   | ✗ |
Partial Multivallate   | ✗ |
Multivallate   | ✗ |
None
None   | ✗ |
Earthen Bank   | ✓ |
Stone Wall   | ✓ |
Rubble   | ✗ |
Wall-walk   | ✗ |
Evidence of Timber   | ✗ |
Vitrification   | ✗ |
Other Burning   | ✗ |
Palisade   | ✗ |
Counter Scarp Bank   | ✓ |
Berm   | ✗ |
Unfinished   | ✗ |
Other   | ✗ |
None
None   | ✗ |
Earthen Bank   | ✓ |
Stone Wall   | ✓ |
Murus Duplex   | ✗ |
Timber-framed   | ✗ |
Timber-laced   | ✗ |
Vitrification   | ✗ |
Other Burning   | ✗ |
Palisade   | ✓ |
Counter Scarp Bank   | ✓ |
Berm   | ✗ |
Unfinished   | ✗ |
No Known Excavation   | ✗ |
Other   | ✗ |
✗   | None |
✓   | None |
Number of Ditches:  2
✗   | None |
Curle, A O (1910) 'Notice of some excavation on the fort occupying the summit of Bonchester Hill, Parish of Hobkirk, Roxburghshire'. Proc Soc Antiq Scot 44 (1909-10), 225-36
NSA (1834-1845) The new statistical account of Scotland by the ministers of the respective parishes under the superintendence of a committee of the society for the benefit of the sons and daughters of the clergy.
Piggott, C M (1952) 'Excavations at Bonchester Hill, 1950'. Proc Soc Antiq Scot 84 (1949-50), 113-37
RCAHMS (1956) The Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland. An inventory of the ancient and historical monuments of Roxburghshire: with the fourteenth report of the Commission, 2v. HMSO: Edinburgh
Atlas of Hillforts:
Wikidata:
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 and should be cited as:
Lock, Gary and Ralston, Ian. 2024. Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland. Available at: https://hillforts.arch.ox.ac.uk
Document Version 1.1