Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland

SC3404: Little Rough Law  

(The Yett)

Sources: Esri, DigitalGlobe, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, GeoEye, USDA FSA, USGS, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, and the GIS User Community

HER:  Scottish Borders 57925

NMR:  NT 71 NE 12 (57925)

SM:  4852

NGR:  NT 7960 1690

X:  379600  Y:  616900  (EPSG:27700)

Boundary:  

Summary

This fort is situated on the NE spur of Green Hill, which forms a steep-sided ridge separating the valleys of the Mainhope Burn from the Heatherhope Burn. Its defences comprise two elements, namely a single rampart enclosing the summit of a knoll on the ridge, and another rampart enclosing an annexe on the NW. The enclosure on the summit measures internally about 62m from NW to SE by 50m transversely (0.24ha), and its rampart has been largely reduced to a scree of grass-grown rubble around the lip of the knoll, along which occasional inner facing-stones can be seen, including a short run on the S. There are two entrances, one allowing access off the spine of the ridge on the SE, and the other opening into the annexe on the NW. The latter forms a roughly rectangular enclosure, taking in the shallow saddle to the NW and a rib of outcrop immediately to its NW, and measures internally a maximum of 65m from NE to SW by 58m transversely (0.35ha). Its rampart springs from the rubble of the main wall of the fort on the NNW, is pierced by an entrance on the NE, and returns to the fort on the W, where it is apparently accompanied by an outer bank. The relationship between the annexe and the fort is unclear, though the configuration on the plan would suggest that it is an addition, in which case it should perhaps be regarded as a free-standing rectilinear settlement enclosure, rather than a subsidiary element in the defences of the fort. The interiors of both are featureless.

Status

Citizen Science:  ✗  

Reliability of Data:  Confirmed

Reliability of Interpretation:  Confirmed

Location

X:  -258710  Y:  7448828  (EPSG: 3857)

Longitude:  -2.324034  Latitude:  55.445574  (EPSG:4326)

Country:  Scotland

Current County or Unitary Authority:  Scottish Borders

Historic County:   Roxburghshire

Current Parish/Community/Council/Townland:  Hownam

Condition

Extant:  
Cropmark:  
Likely Destroyed:  

Land Use

Woodland:  
Commercial Forestry Plantation:  
Parkland:  
Pasture (Grazing):  
Arable:  
Scrub/Bracken:  
Bare Outcrop:  
Heather/Moorland:  
Heath:  
Built-up:  
Coastal Grassland:  
Other:  

Landscape

Hillfort Type

Contour Fort:  
Partial Contour Fort:  
Promontory Fort:  
Hillslope Fort:  
Level Terrain Fort:  
Marsh Fort:  
Multiple Enclosure Fort:  

Topographic Position

Hilltop:  
Coastal Promontory:  
Inland Promontory:  
Valley Bottom:  
Knoll/Hillock/Outcrop:  
Ridge:  
Cliff/Plateau-edge/Scarp:  
Hillslope:  
Lowland:  
Spur:  

Dominant Topographic Feature:  

Aspect

North:  
Northeast:  
East:  
Southeast:  
South:  
Southwest:  
West:  
Northwest:  
Level:  

Elevation

Altitude:  305.0m

Boundary

Boundary Type:  

Second HER:  

Second Current County or Unitary Authority:  

Second Historic County:  

Second Current Parish/Community/Council/Townland:  

Dating Evidence

In the absence of excavation, there are neither stratified artefacts nor radiocarbon dates to provide a chronology for the defences.

Reliability:  D - None

Pre 1200BC:  
1200BC - 800BC:  
1200BC - 800BC:  
400BC - AD50:  
AD50 - AD400:  
AD400 - AD 800:  
Post AD800:  
Unknown:  

Pre Hillfort Activity:  ✗  

Post Hillfort Activity:  ✗  

None:  No details.

Investigations

Photographed by RCAHMS Aerial Survey Programme in 1993 and 2010

1st Identified Map Depiction (1859):  Annotated Fort on the 1st edition OS 25-inch map (Roxburgh 1863, sheet 22.15)
Other (1884):  Noted (Geikie 1884, 141)
Earthwork Survey (1938):  Plan and description (RCAHMS 1956, 163-4, no.304, fig 190; RCAHMS RXD 121/1-2)
Other (1979):  Surveyed at 1:10,000 by the OS
Other (1990):  Scheduled

Interior Features

Featureless

Water Source

None:  
Spring:  
Stream:  
Pool:  
Flush:  
Well:  
Other:  

Surface

No Known Features:  
Round Stone Structures:  
Rectangular Stone Structures:  
Curvilinear Platforms:  
Other Roundhouse Evidence:  
Pits:  
Quarry Hollows:  
Other:  

Excavation

No Known Excavation:  
Pits:  
Postholes:  
Roundhouses:  
Rectangular Structures:  
Roads/Tracks:  
Quarry Hollows:  
Other:  
Nothing Found:  

Geophysics

No Known Geophysics:  
Pits:  
Roundhouses:  
Rectangular Structures:  
Roads/Tracks:  
Quarry Hollows:  
Other:  
Nothing Found:  

Finds

No Known Finds:  
Pottery:  
Metal:  
Metalworking:  
Human Bones:  
Animal Bones:  
Lithics:  
Environmental:  
Other:  

Aerial

NO APPARENT FEATURES

APs Not Checked:  
None:  
Roundhouses:  
Rectangular Structures:  
Pits:  
Postholes:  
Roads/Tracks:  
Other:  

Entrances

See main summary

Total Number of Breaks Through Ramparts:  

Number of Possible Original Entrances:  2:  Generalised to two into the fort (1-2); another provides access into the annexe

Guard Chambers:  

Chevaux de Frise:  ✗  

Entrance 1 (Southeast):  Simple Gap:  Into fort
Entrance 2 (Northwest):  Simple Gap:  Between fort and annexe
Entrance 3 (Northeast):  Simple Gap:  Into the annexe, and also giving access into the interior of the fort

Enclosing Works

Single rampart

Enclosed Area 1:  0.24ha.
Enclosed Area 2:  
Enclosed Area 3:  
Enclosed Area 4:  
Total Enclosed Area:  0.2ha.

Total Footprint Area:  0.82ha.

Multi-period Enclosure System:  ✗  

Ramparts Form a Continuous Circuit:  ✓  

Number of Ramparts:  2

Number of Ramparts NE Quadrant:  1
Number of Ramparts SE Quadrant:  1
Number of Ramparts SW Quadrant:  1
Number of Ramparts NW Quadrant:  2

Current Morphology

Partial Univallate:  
Univallate:  
Partial Bivallate:  
Bivallate:
Partial Multivallate:  
Multivallate:  
Unknown:  

Multi-period Morphology

Partial Univallate:  
Univallate:  
Partial Bivallate:  
Bivallate:  
Partial Multivallate:  
Multivallate:  

Surface Evidence

None:  
Earthen Bank:  
Stone Wall:  
Rubble:  
Wall-walk:  
Evidence of Timber:  
Vitrification:  
Other Burning:  
Palisade:  
Counter Scarp Bank:  
Berm:  
Unfinished:  
Other:  

Excavated Evidence

None:  
Earthen Bank:  
Stone Wall:  
Murus Duplex:  
Timber-framed:  
Timber-laced:  
Vitrification:  
Other Burning:  
Palisade:  
Counter Scarp Bank:  
Berm:  
Unfinished:  
No Known Excavation:  
Other:  

Gang Working

Gang Working:  ✗ 

Ditches

Ditches:  

Number of Ditches:  

Annex

Annex:  ✓  The annexe forms a roughly rectangular enclosure, taking in the shallow saddle to the NW and a rib of outcrop immediately to its NW. Defended by a single rampart, which springs from the rubble of the main wall on the NNW of the fort and returns on the W, it measures internally a maximum of 65m from NE to SW by 58m transversely (0.35ha). There is an entrance on the NE and the interior is featureless. The relationship between the annexe and the fort is unclear, though the configuration on the plan would suggest that it is an addition. Annexes such as this are very unusual and it is perhaps more likely that this is the remains of an independent rectilinear settlement enclosure.

References

Geikie, J (1884) «List of hill forts, intrenched camps, etc. in Roxburghshire on the Scotch side of the Cheviots. Hist Berwickshire Natur Club 10 (1882_4) 139-44

RCAHMS (1956) The Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland. An inventory of the ancient and historical monuments of Roxburghshire: with the fourteenth report of the Commission, 2v. HMSO: Edinburgh

Terms of Use

The online version of the Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland should be cited as:

Lock, G. and Ralston, I. 2017.  Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland. [ONLINE] Available at: https://hillforts.arch.ox.ac.uk.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.