Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland

SC4197 Brei Holm, Papa Stour, Shetland (Papa Stour, Brei Holm, 'Leper Houses'; Maiden Stack)

Satellite Imagery

Satellite Imagery

HER:  Shetland Amenity Trust 253 (None)

NMR:  HU 16 SE 2 (253)

SM:  None

NGR:  HU 1883 6038

X:  418830  Y:  1160380  (OSGB36)

Summary

Tradition held that the small precipitous island of Brei Holm, off the E coast of Papa Stour's SE peninsular, was the site of a leper colony, but Raymond Lamb identified this as one of a number monastic sites with a cluster of eight rectangular buildings likely to be of Norse date (1973; 1976); more recent evaluation trenches amongst these buildings have recovered evidence of complex occupation, and two radiocarbon dates indicate it was occupied in at least the 5th-7th centuries AD (Brady and Batey 2008). While not obviously a promontory fort now, a noted feature of the island is the remains of a bank running the length of the landward facade opposite the mainland of Papa Stour, a distance of about 130m, with a possible entrance opening into a cleft in the cliff-line above the strand of beach that now links the island to the mainland at low water. The island is riven with through sea-caves, which accounts for the origin of the channel that now separates it from the mainland, though at what date it became detached is unknown. Though the bank was not trenched and may yet turn out to be a more recent agricultural boundary, it is possible that the occupation of this island originates as a fortified promontory; its interior covers an irregular area currently measuring 120m from N to S by 100m transversely (0.6ha), and was doubtless once rather larger. The grass-grown stone footings of a cluster of eight sub-rectangular buildings are visible on the top of the island.

Status

Citizen Science:  

Reliability of Data:  Confirmed

Reliability of Interpretation:  Unconfirmed

Location

X:  -184881  Y:  8472947  (EPSG: 3857)

Longitude:  -1.6608102928114634  Latitude:  60.32719411085378  (EPSG:4326)

Country:  Scotland

Current County or Unitary Authority:  Shetland Islands

Historic County:  Shetland

Current Parish/Community/Council/Townland:  Walls And Sandness

Monument Condition

None

Condition:
Extant  
Cropmark  
Likely Destroyed  

Land Use

None

Current Use:
Woodland  
Commercial Forestry Plantation  
Parkland  
Pasture (Grazing)  
Arable  
Scrub/Bracken  
Bare Outcrop  
Heather/Moorland  
Heath  
Built-up  
Coastal Grassland  
Other  

Landscape

Hillfort Type

Island

Type:
Contour Fort  
Partial Contour Fort  
Promontory Fort  
Hillslope Fort  
Level Terrain Fort  
Marsh Fort  
Multiple Enclosure Fort  

Topographic Position

Position:
Hilltop  
Coastal Promontory  
Inland Promontory  
Valley Bottom  
Knoll/Hillock/Outcrop  
Ridge  
Cliff/Plateau-edge/Scarp  
Hillslope  
Lowland  
Spur  

Dominant Topographic Feature:  None

Aspect:
North  
Northeast  
East  
Southeast  
South  
Southwest  
West  
Northwest  
Level  

Altitude:  15.0m

Boundary

N/A


Dating Evidence

The dates clearly point to one period in a long and complex sequence of occupation, though the dates at which this began and ended are unknown. Nor are there any dates for the visible perimeter bank on the landward side.

Reliability:  C - Low

Principal Activity:
Pre 1200BC  
1200BC - 800BC  
800BC - 400BC  
400BC - AD50  
AD50 - AD400  
AD400 - AD 800  
Post AD800  
Unknown  

Other Activity:
Pre Hillfort:   None
Post Hillfort:   None

Evidence:
Artefactual:   Pottery probably of 'Pictish' date
C14:   Two radiocarbon dates from pot residues

Investigation History

Photographed by RCAHMS Aerial Survey Programme

Investigations:
1st Identified Written Reference (1798):   Noted (Stat Acct, xx, 1798, 100-1)
Other (1930):   Description (RCAHMS 1946, iii, 156, no.1704)
1st Identified Map Depiction (1968):   Surveyed at 1:2500 by the OS
Other (1973):   Noted by Raymond Lamb (1973, 89-91; 1976, 153; the absence of photographs from the RCAHMS collection suggests he was never able to visit)
Earthwork Survey (2000):   By Kevin Brady (Brady and Batey 2008, 5 fig 4)
Excavation (2000):   Evaluation (Brady 2000; 2002; Brady and Batey 2008; RCAHMS MS 1069/34 )

Interior Features

A cluster of eight stone-founded, sub-rectangular buildings

Water Source

None

Source:
None  
Spring  
Stream  
Pool  
Flush  
Well  
Other  

Surface

None

Interior Features (Surface):
No Known Features  
Round Stone Structures  
Rectangular Stone Structures  
Curvilinear Platforms  
Other Roundhouse Evidence  
Pits  
Quarry Hollows  
Other  

Excavation

None

Interior Features (Excavation):
No Known Excavation  
Pits  
Postholes  
Roundhouses  
Rectangular Structures  
Roads/Tracks  
Quarry Hollows  
Other  
Nothing Found  

Geophysics

None

Interior Features (Geophysics):
No Known Geophysics  
Pits  
Roundhouses  
Rectangular Structures  
Roads/Tracks  
Quarry Hollows  
Other  
Nothing Found  

Finds

223 sherds of pottery, worked pumice, cut whalebone, furnace lining and industrial waste, and whetstones

Interior (Finds):
No Known Finds  
Pottery  
Metal  
Metalworking  
Human Bones  
Animal Bones  
Lithics  
Environmental  
Other  

Aerial

NO APPARENT FEATURES

Interior Features (Aerial):
APs Not Checked  
None  
Roundhouses  
Rectangular Structures  
Pits  
Postholes  
Roads/Tracks  
Other  

Entrances

See main summary

Total Number of Breaks Through Ramparts:  
1:   None

Number of Possible Original Entrances:  
2:   None

Guard Chambers:  

Chevaux de Frise:  

Entrances:
1. Simple Gap (West):   Cleft midway along the W side

Enclosing Works

Single bank extending along what may once have been the landward edge of a promontory

Enclosed Area:
Area 1:   0.6ha.
Total:   0.6ha.

Total Footprint Area:  Noneha.

Ramparts

None

Multi-period Enclosure System:
✗   None

Ramparts Form a Continuous Circuit:
✗   None

Number of Ramparts:  
NE Quadrant:   0
SE Quadrant:   0
SW Quadrant:   1
NW Quadrant:   1
Total:   1

Morphology

Current Morphology:
Partial Univallate  
Univallate  
Partial Bivallate  
Bivallate  
Partial Multivallate  
Multivallate  
Unknown  

Detailed Morphology:
Partial Univallate  
Univallate  
Partial Bivallate  
Bivallate  
Partial Multivallate  
Multivallate  

Surface Evidence

None

Enclosing Works (Surface):
None  
Earthen Bank  
Stone Wall  
Rubble  
Wall-walk  
Evidence of Timber  
Vitrification  
Other Burning  
Palisade  
Counter Scarp Bank  
Berm  
Unfinished  
Other  

Excavated Evidence

Excavations focused on structures within the interior

Enclosing Works (Excavation):
None  
Earthen Bank  
Stone Wall  
Murus Duplex  
Timber-framed  
Timber-laced  
Vitrification  
Other Burning  
Palisade  
Counter Scarp Bank  
Berm  
Unfinished  
No Known Excavation  
Other  

Other

Gang Working:
✗   None

Ditches:
✗   None

Number of Ditches:  None

Annex:
✗   None

References

Brady, K (2000) Brei Holm Survey and Excavations Papa Stour, Shetland (Data Structure Report). Department of Archaeology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow

Brady, K (2002) 'Brei Holm, Pap Stour: in the footsteps of the papar?'. 69-82 in Crawford, B E (ed) The Papar in the North Atlantic: environment and history. St. Andrews

Brady, K and Batey, C (2008) 'Excavations and Survey on Brei Holm and Maiden Stack, Papa Stour, Shetland'. Scottish Archaeol J 30.1/2 (2008), 1-64

Lamb, R G (1973) 'Coastal settlements of the north'. Scot Archaeol Forum 5 (1973), 76-98

Lamb, R G (1976) 'The Burri Stacks of Culswick, Shetland, and other paired stack-settlements'. Proc Soc Antiq Scot 107 (1975-6), 144-54

RCAHMS (1946) The Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland. Twelfth report with an inventory of the ancient monuments of Orkney and Shetland, 3v. HMSO: Edinburgh



Terms of Use

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 and should be cited as:

Lock, Gary and Ralston, Ian. 2024. Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland. Available at: https://hillforts.arch.ox.ac.uk


Document Version 1.1