Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland

EN0012 Croft Ambrey, Herefordshire

LiDAR 1m DTM Hillshade

LiDAR 1m DTM Hillshade

Satellite Imagery

Satellite Imagery

Scroll left/right to view further images.

HER:  Herefordshire MHE11 (177)

NMR:  SO 46 NW 1 (108422)

SM:  1001750

NGR:  SO 444668

X:  344400  Y:  266800  (OSGB36)

Summary

Fine partial contour hillfort sited above wooded slopes of significant bend of River Lugg dominating the Leintwardine Fishery. Very steep and steep slopes to E, W and N, moderate to S. Roughly D-shaped, with internal area c. 3.6ha. Three substantial banks and ditches complete circuit. Gates and part of interior and annexe famously excavated by Stanford 1960-66. Phased construction and seven periods of occupation suggested between 450 BC to AD 49 on the evidence of gateway renewal. Firstly a rampart (later removed) and ditch (still visible) enclosing 2.2ha. Rows of possibly four-posters for grain storage, thought by Stanford as rows of dwellings. Some evidence of pits, but of the 14 excavated most less than 1m deep, and only four of depth suitable for grain storage. At least five and possibly seven periods of modification/reconstruction, though ten have been suggested at the SW gate, with 20 series of postholes over time. C. 390 BC bank levelled and new enclosure built of 4ha visible as the inner rampart and two external banks and ditches. Later an annexe was added to the S, defined by two weak banks and ditches, to give a total footprint of c. 8.4ha. Intensive occupation to c. 49 BC when the Romans took the fort. C. 2nd century AD a 'mound' was constructed in the annexe, possibly an arena for gatherings and sacrifice/shrine, or indeed a representation of a Romano-Celtic temple or sanctuary. There are two main original entrances identified, that to the SW is complex winding through a series of outworks with hollow way and narrow path into the interior. The second entrance, at the NE corner, is protected by a turning of the two inner ramparts and mounds on the edge of the steep natural scarp. Suggested postern entrance on the W is probably modern. Well-preserved, public access, National Trust site, but bracken problem. On 1st Ed. OS map (1885-1900).

Status

Citizen Science:  

Reliability of Data:  Confirmed

Reliability of Interpretation:  Confirmed

Location

X:  -313557  Y:  6853909  (EPSG: 3857)

Longitude:  -2.816729681078883  Latitude:  52.296467412766525  (EPSG:4326)

Country:  England

Current County or Unitary Authority:  Herefordshire

Historic County:  Herefordshire

Current Parish/Community/Council/Townland:  Aymestry

Monument Condition

Good condition, with management by the National Trust. Recreation pressure generally managed despite no full management plan and wind-throw of scattered trees could be a problem. Repair and re-routing of access path through W entrance.

Condition:
Extant  
Cropmark  
Likely Destroyed  

Land Use

Bracken can be a problem for interpretation during the summer and control carried out.

Current Use:
Woodland  
Commercial Forestry Plantation  
Parkland  
Pasture (Grazing)  
Arable  
Scrub/Bracken  
Bare Outcrop  
Heather/Moorland  
Heath  
Built-up  
Coastal Grassland  
Other  

Landscape

Hillfort Type

The fort partly follows the contours. Sited on a spur above a significant bend of the River Lugg dominating the Leintwardine Fishery.

Type:
Contour Fort  
Partial Contour Fort  
Promontory Fort  
Hillslope Fort  
Level Terrain Fort  
Marsh Fort  
Multiple Enclosure Fort  

Topographic Position

Position:
Hilltop  
Coastal Promontory  
Inland Promontory  
Valley Bottom  
Knoll/Hillock/Outcrop  
Ridge  
Cliff/Plateau-edge/Scarp  
Hillslope  
Lowland  
Spur  

Dominant Topographic Feature:  Spur above the River Lugg.

Aspect:
North  
Northeast  
East  
Southeast  
South  
Southwest  
West  
Northwest  
Level  

Altitude:  295.0m

Boundary

N/A


Dating Evidence

Stanford suggested seven periods of occupation, as a result of the renewal of the gates, between 450 BC to AD 49. Firstly a rampart (later removed) and ditch (still visible) enclosing 2.2ha. Rows of possibly four-posters for grain storage. At least five periods of modification/reconstruction. C. 390 BC bank levelled and new enclosure built of 4ha visible as the inner rampart and two external banks and ditches. Later an annexe was added to the S, defined by two weak banks and ditches. The mound, which was fully excavated, was of late Roman date, built over an initial early Roman terrace. Here coarse ware predominated, but also included some Samian ware. Iron Age metal-ware found. C14 dating from the excavation appears problematical as vast range between 1700-750 cal BC.

Reliability:  B - Medium

Principal Activity:
Pre 1200BC  
1200BC - 800BC  
800BC - 400BC  
400BC - AD50  
AD50 - AD400  
AD400 - AD 800  
Post AD800  
Unknown  

Other Activity:
Pre Hillfort:   None
Post Hillfort:   None

Evidence:
Artefactual:   Iron Age pottery from the main enclosure. Coarse ware predominated in the annexe, but also included some Samian ware.
Artefactual:   Triskele pendants found.
C14:   Stanford - problematic as vast range 1700 BC to 750 BC?
Morphology/Earthwork/Typology:   Stanford suggested seven periods of occupation as a result of the renewal of the gates.

Investigation History

In Aubrey's Monumenta Britannica (1665-1693). On 1st Ed. OS map (1885-1900). Excavations between 1960-66 by the Woolhope Naturalist's Field Club under the direction of S.C. Stanford, excavation report published privately 1974. Herefordshire Council survey 2012.

Investigations:
Other (1968):   Visit by Hillfort Study Group
Other (2012):   Herefordshire Council survey.
1st Identified Written Reference (None):   Aubrey's Monumenta Britannica.
1st Identified Map Depiction (None):   OS map.
Excavation (None):   Excavations between 1960-66 by the Woolhope Naturalist's Field Club under the direction of S.C. Stanford.

Interior Features

Rows of possibly four-posters for grain storage a feature of the excavations. Pit evidence found by excavation (14 pits) in the main enclosure. Most only to just over 1m deep.At least five periods of modification/reconstruction. Terrace and mound constructed in the annexe in the Roman period. Two medieval pillow mounds in the annexe. Platforms protected by drainage hoods on the N side of the quarry ditch. Iron Age and Roman pottery, metal-ware and bone found with many other finds in the excavations.

Water Source

Stream located 0.5 km outside the hillfort.

Source:
None  
Spring  
Stream  
Pool  
Flush  
Well  
Other  

Surface

Terrace and mound constructed in the annexe in the Roman period. Two medieval pillow mounds in the annexe. Platforms protected by drainage hoods on the N side of the quarry ditch. terraces cut into the N-facing hillside.

Interior Features (Surface):
No Known Features  
Round Stone Structures  
Rectangular Stone Structures  
Curvilinear Platforms  
Other Roundhouse Evidence  
Pits  
Quarry Hollows  
Other  

Excavation

Rows of four-post structures and pit evidence found by excavation (14 pits) in the main enclosure. Most less than 1m deep. Some contained burnt clay and grain (carbonised wheat), but only four of suitable depth for grain storage. A Roman terrace and squarish mound found in the annexe. Further detail from the fine excavation report.

Interior Features (Excavation):
No Known Excavation  
Pits  
Postholes  
Roundhouses  
Rectangular Structures  
Roads/Tracks  
Quarry Hollows  
Other  
Nothing Found  

Geophysics

None

Interior Features (Geophysics):
No Known Geophysics  
Pits  
Roundhouses  
Rectangular Structures  
Roads/Tracks  
Quarry Hollows  
Other  
Nothing Found  

Finds

Many finds including Iron Age and Roman pottery (Malvernian ware, VCP and others), gold, bronze, shale and glass ornaments, slag, furnace lining and ore, clay and limestone loom weights, querns and animal and human bone. Charcoal. Bronze Age sherd.

Interior (Finds):
No Known Finds  
Pottery  
Metal  
Metalworking  
Human Bones  
Animal Bones  
Lithics  
Environmental  
Other  

Aerial

None

Interior Features (Aerial):
APs Not Checked  
None  
Roundhouses  
Rectangular Structures  
Pits  
Postholes  
Roads/Tracks  
Other  

Entrances

In first phase entrances to the E and W. Circa 390 BC new NE gate constructed and added on SW. Hollow way to the NE forms the approach to the fort with complex series of outworks. The NE entrance flanked by turning of the two inner ramparts and three mounds on the edge of the steep natural scarp. SW gap now main public entrance. Suggested postern entrance on the W is probably modern.

Total Number of Breaks Through Ramparts:  
2:   Main entrance for public now directed though SW entrance. Suggested postern entrance on the W is probably modern.

Number of Possible Original Entrances:  
2:   In first phase entrances to the E and W. Circa 390 BC new NE gate constructed and added on SW. Hollow way to the NE forms the approach to the fort.

Guard Chambers:  

Chevaux de Frise:  

Entrances:
1. Simple Gap (South west):   Now main public entrance.
2. Hollow Way (North east):   Hollow way forms approach to fort.
2. In-turned (North east):   Two inner ramparts turned and three mounds, guard chambers.
2. Outworks (North east):   Complicated series of outworks.

Enclosing Works

Three ramparts and deep ditches define the site. Main rampart c. 10m above the external ditch with two lesser outer banks, the most S suggested as incomplete.

Enclosed Area:
Area 1:   2.2ha.
Area 2:   3.6ha.
Total:   3.6ha.

Total Footprint Area:  8.4ha.

Ramparts

None

Multi-period Enclosure System:
✓   Phased construction and seven periods of occupation suggested between 450 BC to AD 49 on the evidence of gateway renewal. Firstly a rampart (later removed) and ditch (still visible) enclosing 2.2ha. Rows of possibly four-posters for grain storage. At least five periods of modification/reconstruction. Circa 390 BC bank levelled and new enclosure built of 3.6a visible as the inner rampart and two external banks and ditches. Later an annexe was added to the S, defined by two weak banks and ditches. The mound in the annexe proved to be Roman.

Ramparts Form a Continuous Circuit:
✓   Three ramparts complete the circuit.

Number of Ramparts:  
NE Quadrant:   3
SE Quadrant:   3
SW Quadrant:   3
NW Quadrant:   3
Total:   3

Morphology

Current Morphology:
Partial Univallate  
Univallate  
Partial Bivallate  
Bivallate  
Partial Multivallate  
Multivallate  
Unknown  

Detailed Morphology:
Partial Univallate  
Univallate  
Partial Bivallate  
Bivallate  
Partial Multivallate  
Multivallate  

Surface Evidence

It has been suggested that the most S of the two lesser outer banks is incomplete.

Enclosing Works (Surface):
None  
Earthen Bank  
Stone Wall  
Rubble  
Wall-walk  
Evidence of Timber  
Vitrification  
Other Burning  
Palisade  
Counter Scarp Bank  
Berm  
Unfinished  
Other  

Excavated Evidence

Detail is outlined in the summary.

Enclosing Works (Excavation):
None  
Earthen Bank  
Stone Wall  
Murus Duplex  
Timber-framed  
Timber-laced  
Vitrification  
Other Burning  
Palisade  
Counter Scarp Bank  
Berm  
Unfinished  
No Known Excavation  
Other  

Other

Gang Working:
✗   None

Ditches:
✓   The external ditch is up to 10m below the main rampart.

Number of Ditches:  3

Annex:
✓   Large entrance located on the S of the main enclosure with two weak banks that get smaller as they turn N. Within the annexe of c. 4.8ha Stanford found an early Roman terrace, followed by a squarish mound which had clearly been used for animal sacrifice and which has been suggested as a possible Romano-British temple.

References

Darvill, T. Stamper, P. and Timby, J. 2000. England an archaeological guide, 202-3, Oxford: OUP.

Dorling, P. and Wigley, A. 2012: Assessment of the archaeological and conservation status of major later prehistoric enclosures in Herefordshire and Shropshire, EH PNUM, Version 3.2, Hereford and Shrewsbury: Herefordshire Council/Shropshire Council.

Field, D, Smith, N. 2008. Croft Ambrey, Aymestrey, Herefordshire. Analysis of earthworks, Archaeological Survey Report, Swindon: English Heritage.

Stanford, S. 1974. Croft Ambrey, Leominster: Privately published.



Terms of Use

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 and should be cited as:

Lock, Gary and Ralston, Ian. 2024. Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland. Available at: https://hillforts.arch.ox.ac.uk


Document Version 1.1