Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland

EN0546 Hetchester Camp, Northumberland

LiDAR 1m DTM Hillshade

LiDAR 1m DTM Hillshade

Satellite Imagery

Satellite Imagery

Scroll left/right to view further images.

HER:  Northumberland 1222 (None)

NMR:  NT 90 SE 32 (1805)

SM:  None

NGR:  NT 9813 0147

X:  398130  Y:  601470  (OSGB36)

Summary

Lying 800m to the N of Hepple, at 183m OD on the summit of Wreigh Hill, the site of a possible multivallate contour fort, now destroyed. The hill falls away gently to the S and W to the valley of the River Coquet. The site was described by Mackenzie (1825) as being oval, measuring 128m by 82m internally. The included plan suggests multiple ramparts and ditches which MacLauchlan (1867) clarifies as three ramparts. The inner ditch is given as 5.5m wide and the external ditch 4.6m wide, the ramparts 4.6m high and 1.8m wide where they survived. Only two ditches were recorded on the steepest side in the NW. The location of entrances is not given. The foundations of buildings were recorded within the interior. Several querns, defaced Roman coins and large quantities of antlers of red deer were found by quarrymen (Dixon 1903). The site was quarried on all sides for limestone for lime production and grass covered quarry pits and spoil heaps are all that remain. A field inspectors visit in 1957 confirmed no trace of the enclosing works could be seen. This site is shown as 'Hetchester site of' on 1856-65 OS mapping. Undated but the described morphology of the earthworks suggests Iron Age, the finds lpossibly representing later re-use.

Status

Citizen Science:  ✗

Reliability of Data:  Unconfirmed

Reliability of Interpretation:  Irreconciled issues

Location

X:  -226090  Y:  7421746  (EPSG: 3857)

Longitude:  -2.030999227438637  Latitude:  55.307347999010055  (EPSG:4326)

Country:  England

Current County or Unitary Authority:  Northumberland

Historic County:  Northumberland

Current Parish/Community/Council/Townland:  Hepple

Monument Condition

Quarried

Condition:
Extant   ✗
Cropmark   ✗
Likely Destroyed   ✓

Land Use

None

Current Use:
Woodland   ✗
Commercial Forestry Plantation   ✗
Parkland   ✗
Pasture (Grazing)   ✓
Arable   ✗
Scrub/Bracken   ✗
Bare Outcrop   ✗
Heather/Moorland   ✗
Heath   ✗
Built-up   ✗
Coastal Grassland   ✗
Other   ✗

Landscape

Hillfort Type

A former contour fort lying at 183m OD on the summit of Wreigh Hill

Type:
Contour Fort   ✓
Partial Contour Fort   ✗
Promontory Fort   ✗
Hillslope Fort   ✗
Level Terrain Fort   ✗
Marsh Fort   ✗
Multiple Enclosure Fort   ✗

Topographic Position

Position:
Hilltop   ✓
Coastal Promontory   ✗
Inland Promontory   ✗
Valley Bottom   ✗
Knoll/Hillock/Outcrop   ✗
Ridge   ✗
Cliff/Plateau-edge/Scarp   ✗
Hillslope   ✗
Lowland   ✗
Spur   ✗

Dominant Topographic Feature:  Summit of Wreigh Hill

Aspect:
North   ✗
Northeast   ✗
East   ✗
Southeast   ✗
South   ✗
Southwest   ✗
West   ✗
Northwest   ✗
Level   ✓

Altitude:  183.0m

Boundary

N/A


Dating Evidence

The described morphology of the earthworks suggests Iron Age. Several querns, defaced Roman coins and large quantities of antlers of red deer were found by workmen, these and the stone-founded buildings suggests later activity.

Reliability:  D - None

Principal Activity:
Pre 1200BC   ✗
1200BC - 800BC   ✗
800BC - 400BC   ✗
400BC - AD50   ✗
AD50 - AD400   ✗
AD400 - AD 800   ✗
Post AD800   ✗
Unknown   ✓

Other Activity:
Pre Hillfort:   None
Post Hillfort:   Roman activity; quarrying and limekilns.

Evidence:
Artefactual:   None
Morphology/Earthwork/Typology:   None

Investigation History

The site has been described by a number of authors, possibly paraphrasing MacKenzie (1825). It is shown on 1856-65 OS mapping as 'Hetchester site of'. Field investigation 1957

Investigations:
1st Identified Written Reference (1825):   None
Other (1957):   Field investigation
1st Identified Map Depiction (None):   None

Interior Features

The 'foundations of ancient buildings' were recorded within the enclosure but their form is not given

Water Source

None

Source:
None   ✓
Spring   ✗
Stream   ✗
Pool   ✗
Flush   ✗
Well   ✗
Other   ✗

Surface

Buidling foundations recorded but morphology is unknown

Interior Features (Surface):
No Known Features   ✗
Round Stone Structures   ✗
Rectangular Stone Structures   ✗
Curvilinear Platforms   ✗
Other Roundhouse Evidence   ✗
Pits   ✗
Quarry Hollows   ✗
Other   ✓

Excavation

None

Interior Features (Excavation):
No Known Excavation   ✓
Pits   ✗
Postholes   ✗
Roundhouses   ✗
Rectangular Structures   ✗
Roads/Tracks   ✗
Quarry Hollows   ✗
Other   ✗
Nothing Found   ✗

Geophysics

None

Interior Features (Geophysics):
No Known Geophysics   ✓
Pits   ✗
Roundhouses   ✗
Rectangular Structures   ✗
Roads/Tracks   ✗
Quarry Hollows   ✗
Other   ✗
Nothing Found   ✗

Finds

None

Interior (Finds):
No Known Finds   ✓
Pottery   ✗
Metal   ✗
Metalworking   ✗
Human Bones   ✗
Animal Bones   ✗
Lithics   ✗
Environmental   ✗
Other   ✗

Aerial

None

Interior Features (Aerial):
APs Not Checked   ✓
None   ✗
Roundhouses   ✗
Rectangular Structures   ✗
Pits   ✗
Postholes   ✗
Roads/Tracks   ✗
Other   ✗

Entrances

The location of entrances is unrecorded

Total Number of Breaks Through Ramparts:  
None:   None

Number of Possible Original Entrances:  
2:   None

Guard Chambers:  ✗

Chevaux de Frise:  ✗

Entrances:No related records

Enclosing Works

Oval in form 128m by 82m internally. Three ramparts are reported by MacLauchlan (1867). Mackenzie (1825) records '..the fort has had but two ditches....' in the NW, indicating further ditches were present elsewhere. Inner ditch is given as 5.5m wide and the external ditch 4.6m wide, the ramparts 4.6m high and 1.8m wide where they survived.

Enclosed Area:
Area 1:   0.7ha.
Total:   0.7ha.

Total Footprint Area:  Noneha.

Ramparts

None

Multi-period Enclosure System:
✗   Enclosed area estimated from measurements

Ramparts Form a Continuous Circuit:
✓   Conjecture - taken from the plan by Mackenzie (1825)

Number of Ramparts:  
NE Quadrant:   3
SE Quadrant:   3
SW Quadrant:   3
NW Quadrant:   3
Total:   3

Morphology

Current Morphology:
Partial Univallate   ✗
Univallate   ✗
Partial Bivallate   ✗
Bivallate   ✗
Partial Multivallate   ✗
Multivallate   ✓
Unknown   ✗

Detailed Morphology:
Partial Univallate   ✗
Univallate   ✗
Partial Bivallate   ✗
Bivallate   ✗
Partial Multivallate   ✗
Multivallate   ✗

Surface Evidence

Destroyed

Enclosing Works (Surface):
None   ✓
Earthen Bank   ✗
Stone Wall   ✗
Rubble   ✗
Wall-walk   ✗
Evidence of Timber   ✗
Vitrification   ✗
Other Burning   ✗
Palisade   ✗
Counter Scarp Bank   ✗
Berm   ✗
Unfinished   ✗
Other   ✗

Excavated Evidence

None

Enclosing Works (Excavation):
None   ✗
Earthen Bank   ✗
Stone Wall   ✗
Murus Duplex   ✗
Timber-framed   ✗
Timber-laced   ✗
Vitrification   ✗
Other Burning   ✗
Palisade   ✗
Counter Scarp Bank   ✗
Berm   ✗
Unfinished   ✗
No Known Excavation   ✓
Other   ✗

Other

Gang Working:
✗   None

Ditches:
✓   At least two ditches are recorded, further might have existed.

Number of Ditches:  2

Annex:
✗   None

References

Dixon, D.D. 1903 Upper Coquetdale, Northumberland: its history, traditions, and folk lore. R. Redpath, Newcastle-upon-Tyne.125-6

Mackenzie, E. (ed) 1825. An historical, topographical and descriptive view of the county of Northumberland. 2nd Ed. Vol II. Mackenzie and Dent

MacLauchlan,H. 1867. Notes not included in the memoirs already published on Roman roads in Northumberland (Alnwick) 84



Terms of Use

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 and should be cited as:

Lock, Gary and Ralston, Ian. 2024. Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland. Available at: https://hillforts.arch.ox.ac.uk


Document Version 1.1