Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland

EN3612 Pitchbury Ramparts, Essex (Pitchbury Rings)

LiDAR 1m DTM Hillshade

LiDAR 1m DTM Hillshade

Satellite Imagery

Satellite Imagery

Scroll left/right to view further images.

HER:  Essex 11654 (None)

NMR:  TL 92 NE 23 (383781)

SM:  1019959

NGR:  TL 96642 28982

X:  596642  Y:  228982  (OSGB36)

Summary

Lying to the S of Pitchbury Woods, the remains of a bivallate hillfort located on a gravel spur. The enclosure was oval in plan measuring 300m N-S by 190m transversely enclosing 1.9ha. Possibly originally univallate with a further outer rampart or counterscarp, and a ditch which was added later. The majority of the ramparts were levelled for arable by 1844 with the NW arc surviving where the ramparts now define the south-eastern extent of Pitchbury Wood. In this region the banks stand approximately 3m high and 18m from crest to crest. An excavation in 1933 was not fully published, but a paper given by the excavator in 1933 is included in a report by Crummy (1995) following a rescue excavation in 1973. The 1933 excavations across a section of the extant rampart in the N, the remains of the ramparts in the E and W, the causeway, and part of the interior, showed the ramparts had been constructed as simple dumps of gravel with no evidence of revetment. Traces of an outer, flat-bottomed ditch was discovered in the E, possibly unfinished. The ditches cut into the London Clay and retained water. The causewayed entrance, approximately 11m wide in the NE, was floored with gravel and showed little sign of use. Two pits and two hearths were identified within the interior. The 1973 excavations ahead of the installation of a gas pipeline showed the inner ditch measured 8.5m wide and 2.6m deep at the E end and 10m wide and 2.3m deep at the W. The outer ditch, confirmed as present only in the E, measured 4.3m wide and 1.5m deep. Mesolithic and late Neolithic worked flint and earlier prehistoric pottery was recovered from the interior and beneath the ramparts. A number of shallow pits of unknown function were recorded within the interior. It was concluded that the site was unfinished owing to the incomplete nature of the outer ditch and the scarcity of material culture, with the site seeing only occasional use, possibly as a place of refuge (Crummy and Cruso 1995). Burnt wood recovered from towards the bottom of the inner ditch was radiocarbon dated 10BC+/-80. It was concluded that the site saw some occupation in the eighth to fourth centuries BC based on pottery, but the form of the hillfort and small sherds of pottery suggest it was constructed in the late Iron Age c. 50AD to AD10. Recorded as an incomplete earthwork on 1876, 1:2,500 OS mapping. Scheduled.

Status

Citizen Science:  ✗

Reliability of Data:  Confirmed

Reliability of Interpretation:  Confirmed

Location

X:  95559  Y:  6786498  (EPSG: 3857)

Longitude:  0.8584230220515374  Latitude:  51.924569401221554  (EPSG:4326)

Country:  England; None

Current County or Unitary Authority:  Essex

Historic County:  Essex

Current Parish/Community/Council/Townland:  Great Horkesley; West Bergholt

Monument Condition

On Heritage at Risk Register (2015). Extensive plough damage to the interior recorded during 1973 excavations. Well-defined cropmark on 2005 Google earth satellite imagery

Condition:
Extant   ✓
Cropmark   ✗
Likely Destroyed   ✗

Land Use

Northern arc of the ramparts survive in woodland

Current Use:
Woodland   ✓
Commercial Forestry Plantation   ✗
Parkland   ✗
Pasture (Grazing)   ✗
Arable   ✓
Scrub/Bracken   ✗
Bare Outcrop   ✗
Heather/Moorland   ✗
Heath   ✗
Built-up   ✗
Coastal Grassland   ✗
Other   ✗

Landscape

Hillfort Type

A lowland site lying on level ground on a gravel spur at 53m OD

Type:
Contour Fort   ✗
Partial Contour Fort   ✗
Promontory Fort   ✗
Hillslope Fort   ✗
Level Terrain Fort   ✓
Marsh Fort   ✗
Multiple Enclosure Fort   ✗

Topographic Position

Position:
Hilltop   ✗
Coastal Promontory   ✗
Inland Promontory   ✗
Valley Bottom   ✗
Knoll/Hillock/Outcrop   ✗
Ridge   ✗
Cliff/Plateau-edge/Scarp   ✗
Hillslope   ✗
Lowland   ✓
Spur   ✓

Dominant Topographic Feature:  Gravel spur

Aspect:
North   ✗
Northeast   ✗
East   ✗
Southeast   ✗
South   ✗
Southwest   ✗
West   ✗
Northwest   ✗
Level   ✓

Altitude:  53.0m

Boundary

The parish boundary between Great Horkesley and West Bergholt lies 60m to the W, following the line of a brook

Boundary Type:  Parish/Townland


Dating Evidence

Burnt wood recovered from towards the bottom of the inner ditch was radiocarbon dated 10BC+/-80. It was concluded that the site saw some occupation in the eighth to fourth centuries BC based on pottery, but the form of the hillfort and small sherds of pottery suggest it was constructed in the late Iron Age c. 50AD to AD10.

Reliability:  B - Medium

Principal Activity:
Pre 1200BC   ✗
1200BC - 800BC   ✗
800BC - 400BC   ✓
400BC - AD50   ✓
AD50 - AD400   ✓
AD400 - AD 800   ✗
Post AD800   ✗
Unknown   ✗

Other Activity:
Pre Hillfort:   None
Post Hillfort:   None

Evidence:
Artefactual:   Iron Age pottery
Artefactual:   Mesolithic and Neolithic flint
C14:   Single radiocarbon date

Investigation History

Shown by Stukeley as Horksley Heath on a map of 1759 of the earthworks on Lexden Heath (Crummy and Cruso 1995, 16. Fig 2.7). RCHM plan drawn in 1922. Excavated in 1924 (unpublished) 1933 and 1973 (Crummy and Cruso 1995). Geophysical survey 1973, AML. Scheduled

Investigations:
1st Identified Map Depiction (1759):   Map of 1759 by William Stukeley of the earthworks on Lexden Heath
1st Identified Written Reference (1759):   Stukeley
Excavation (1924):   Unpublished
Excavation (1933):   None
Excavation (1973):   None
Geophysical Survey (1973):   Location of magnetometer survey shown on site plan (Crummy and Cruso 1975)
Other (1973):   Scheduled

Interior Features

Two pits and two hearths identified during 1933 excavations, with a further 47 shallow pits of unknown purpose partially excavated in 1973, pottery and lithics recovered.

Water Source

Brook to the E

Source:
None   ✓
Spring   ✗
Stream   ✗
Pool   ✗
Flush   ✗
Well   ✗
Other   ✗

Surface

None

Interior Features (Surface):
No Known Features   ✓
Round Stone Structures   ✗
Rectangular Stone Structures   ✗
Curvilinear Platforms   ✗
Other Roundhouse Evidence   ✗
Pits   ✗
Quarry Hollows   ✗
Other   ✗

Excavation

Hearths

Interior Features (Excavation):
No Known Excavation   ✗
Pits   ✓
Postholes   ✗
Roundhouses   ✗
Rectangular Structures   ✗
Roads/Tracks   ✗
Quarry Hollows   ✗
Other   ✓
Nothing Found   ✗

Geophysics

Unidentified anomaly, possibly a medieval pottery kiln

Interior Features (Geophysics):
No Known Geophysics   ✗
Pits   ✗
Roundhouses   ✗
Rectangular Structures   ✗
Roads/Tracks   ✗
Quarry Hollows   ✗
Other   ✓
Nothing Found   ✗

Finds

None

Interior (Finds):
No Known Finds   ✗
Pottery   ✓
Metal   ✗
Metalworking   ✗
Human Bones   ✗
Animal Bones   ✗
Lithics   ✓
Environmental   ✗
Other   ✗

Aerial

None

Interior Features (Aerial):
APs Not Checked   ✓
None   ✗
Roundhouses   ✗
Rectangular Structures   ✗
Pits   ✗
Postholes   ✗
Roads/Tracks   ✗
Other   ✗

Entrances

Causewayed entrance, approximately 11m wide in the NE, floored with gravel

Total Number of Breaks Through Ramparts:  
2:   Through both ramparts

Number of Possible Original Entrances:  
2:   None

Guard Chambers:  ✗

Chevaux de Frise:  ✗

Entrances:
1. Simple Gap (North east):   None

Enclosing Works

Oval, bivallate hillfort measuring 300m N-S by 190m transversely enclosing 1.9ha. Possibly originally univallate with a further outer rampart or counterscarp and a ditch which was added later. Only the NW arc remains extant in woodland. In this region the banks stand approximately 3m high and 18m from crest to crest. The ramparts were constructed as simple dumps of gravel with no evidence of revetment. Traces of an outer, flat-bottomed ditch was discovered in the E, possibly unfinished. The ditches cut into the London Clay and retained water. Excavations in 1973 showed the inner ditch measured 8.5m wide and 2.6m deep at the E end and 10m wide and 2.3m deep at the W. The outer ditch, confirmed as present only in the E, measured 4.3m wide and 1.5m deep.

Enclosed Area:
Area 1:   1.9ha.
Total:   1.9ha.

Total Footprint Area:  Noneha.

Ramparts

None

Multi-period Enclosure System:
✓   None

Ramparts Form a Continuous Circuit:
✓   Cropmark evidence shows it was once a complete circuit, second bank possibly a counterscarp.

Number of Ramparts:  
NE Quadrant:   2
SE Quadrant:   2
SW Quadrant:   2
NW Quadrant:   1
Total:   2

Morphology

Current Morphology:
Partial Univallate   ✓
Univallate   ✗
Partial Bivallate   ✓
Bivallate   ✗
Partial Multivallate   ✗
Multivallate   ✗
Unknown   ✗

Detailed Morphology:
Partial Univallate   ✗
Univallate   ✓
Partial Bivallate   ✗
Bivallate   ✗
Partial Multivallate   ✗
Multivallate   ✗

Surface Evidence

None

Enclosing Works (Surface):
None   ✗
Earthen Bank   ✓
Stone Wall   ✗
Rubble   ✗
Wall-walk   ✗
Evidence of Timber   ✗
Vitrification   ✗
Other Burning   ✗
Palisade   ✗
Counter Scarp Bank   ✓
Berm   ✗
Unfinished   ✓
Other   ✗

Excavated Evidence

Gravel, dump rampart

Enclosing Works (Excavation):
None   ✗
Earthen Bank   ✓
Stone Wall   ✗
Murus Duplex   ✗
Timber-framed   ✗
Timber-laced   ✗
Vitrification   ✗
Other Burning   ✗
Palisade   ✗
Counter Scarp Bank   ✗
Berm   ✗
Unfinished   ✗
No Known Excavation   ✗
Other   ✗

Other

Gang Working:
✗   None

Ditches:
✓   None

Number of Ditches:  2

Annex:
✗   None

References

Clark , A. 1973. Geophysics: Pitchbury Camp, Essex, AML Report (Old Series) 1608

Crummy, P. and Cruso T. Pitchbury Ramparts Excavations 1933 and 1973, in Hawkes, C. F. C. and Crummy, P. 1995. Colchester Archaeological Report 11: Camulodunum 2. Colchester Archaeological Trust Ltd. 138-154. https://cat.essex.ac.uk/reports/CAR-report-0011.pdf. Accessed November 2015



Terms of Use

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 and should be cited as:

Lock, Gary and Ralston, Ian. 2024. Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland. Available at: https://hillforts.arch.ox.ac.uk


Document Version 1.1