Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland

EN3728 Ditchling Beacon, Sussex

LiDAR 1m DTM Hillshade

LiDAR 1m DTM Hillshade

Satellite Imagery

Satellite Imagery

Scroll left/right to view further images.

HER:  East Sussex MES1289 (None)

NMR:  TQ 31 SW 13 (403045)

SM:  1015340

NGR:  TQ33151300

X:  533155  Y:  113020  (OSGB36)

Summary

Univallate contour hillfort located on summit of prominent Ditchling Beacon on ridge of South Downs. Far-reaching views from site. Steep slopes, becoming very steep on N and NE, moderate along ridge to S. Roughly rectangular area encloses c. 7ha. Simple rampart, to c. 1m high, above generally infilled ditch, c. 3m wide and to 0.5m deep, follow contours on E and NW sides. Most of S part reduced or lost to ploughing. On N steep natural slopes make ramparts unnecessary. Several gaps of later downland tracks and paths cross the monument; original entrance nor determined. Excavations by Crow, D.A. and Williamson (Crow 1930) proved inconclusive, other than Iron Age and Roman pottery. Some evidence of early Iron Age sherds from rampart dump. Resistivity survey and trial trenching 2000 found two prehistoric features, but suggested enclosure formed by natural fissures in the chalk (Butler 2001). Later beacon hearth mound, one of a chain of beacons stretching along South Downs during medieval and post-medieval periods, 18th/19th century dewpond and 19th century boundary stone. On 1st Ed. OS map (1874).

Status

Citizen Science:  ✗

Reliability of Data:  Confirmed

Reliability of Interpretation:  Confirmed

Location

X:  -11993  Y:  6603844  (EPSG: 3857)

Longitude:  -0.10773734423805807  Latitude:  50.90124468172535  (EPSG:4326)

Country:  England; None

Current County or Unitary Authority:  East Sussex

Historic County:  Sussex

Current Parish/Community/Council/Townland:  Ditchling; Westmeston

Monument Condition

Most of S half reduced or destroyed by ploughing. Elsewhere ramparts weak to 1.0m high, but generally well-preserved. Modern tracks mutilated entrances. Beacon mound disturbed by OS trig point. Viewpoint panel. Popular with visitors. National Trust site.

Condition:
Extant   ✓
Cropmark   ✗
Likely Destroyed   ✗

Land Use

Rough grazing. SSSI.

Current Use:
Woodland   ✗
Commercial Forestry Plantation   ✗
Parkland   ✗
Pasture (Grazing)   ✓
Arable   ✗
Scrub/Bracken   ✗
Bare Outcrop   ✗
Heather/Moorland   ✗
Heath   ✗
Built-up   ✗
Coastal Grassland   ✗
Other   ✗

Landscape

Hillfort Type

Univallate contour hillfort located on summit of prominent Ditchling Beacon on ridge of South Downs. Far-reaching views from site. Steep slopes, becoming very steep on N and NE, moderate along ridge to S.

Type:
Contour Fort   ✓
Partial Contour Fort   ✗
Promontory Fort   ✗
Hillslope Fort   ✗
Level Terrain Fort   ✗
Marsh Fort   ✗
Multiple Enclosure Fort   ✗

Topographic Position

Position:
Hilltop   ✗
Coastal Promontory   ✗
Inland Promontory   ✗
Valley Bottom   ✗
Knoll/Hillock/Outcrop   ✗
Ridge   ✓
Cliff/Plateau-edge/Scarp   ✗
Hillslope   ✗
Lowland   ✗
Spur   ✗

Dominant Topographic Feature:  Ridge summit.

Aspect:
North   ✗
Northeast   ✗
East   ✗
Southeast   ✗
South   ✗
Southwest   ✗
West   ✗
Northwest   ✗
Level   ✓

Altitude:  248.0m

Boundary

Boundary Type:  Parish/Townland


Dating Evidence

Iron Age and Romano-British pottery; some evidence of early Iron Age sherds from rampart dump.

Reliability:  C - Low

Principal Activity:
Pre 1200BC   ✗
1200BC - 800BC   ✗
800BC - 400BC   ✓
400BC - AD50   ✓
AD50 - AD400   ✗
AD400 - AD 800   ✗
Post AD800   ✗
Unknown   ✗

Other Activity:
Pre Hillfort:   None
Post Hillfort:   None

Evidence:
Artefactual:   Iron Age and Romano-British pottery.

Investigation History

On 1st Ed. OS map (1874). Excavation D.A. Crow and Ross-Williamson 1929. Geophysical survey and trial trenching C. Butler, Mid Sussex Field Archaeological Team 2000. Measured survey N. Bannister, National Trust historic landscape survey 2000.

Investigations:
1st Identified Map Depiction (1874):   OS map.
Geophysical Survey (2000):   Resistivilty survey and trial trenching.
Earthwork Survey (2000):   Measured survey.

Interior Features

Resistivity survey and trial trenching 2000 found two prehistoric features, but suggested enclosure formed by natural fissures in the chalk. Few sherds of Iron Age pottery and Romano-British, charcoal, flint flakes from 1929 excavations.

Water Source

Later dew ponds in NW corner suggest possible source.

Source:
None   ✗
Spring   ✗
Stream   ✗
Pool   ✗
Flush   ✗
Well   ✗
Other   ✓

Surface

None

Interior Features (Surface):
No Known Features   ✓
Round Stone Structures   ✗
Rectangular Stone Structures   ✗
Curvilinear Platforms   ✗
Other Roundhouse Evidence   ✗
Pits   ✗
Quarry Hollows   ✗
Other   ✗

Excavation

Possible hut sites proved negative in 1929 excavations.

Interior Features (Excavation):
No Known Excavation   ✗
Pits   ✗
Postholes   ✗
Roundhouses   ✗
Rectangular Structures   ✗
Roads/Tracks   ✗
Quarry Hollows   ✗
Other   ✗
Nothing Found   ✓

Geophysics

Resistivity survey and trial trenching 2000 found two prehistoric features, but suggested enclosure formed by natural fissures in the chalk.

Interior Features (Geophysics):
No Known Geophysics   ✗
Pits   ✗
Roundhouses   ✗
Rectangular Structures   ✗
Roads/Tracks   ✗
Quarry Hollows   ✗
Other   ✓
Nothing Found   ✗

Finds

Few sherds of Iron Age pottery and Romano-British, charcoal, flint flakes from 1929 excavations.

Interior (Finds):
No Known Finds   ✗
Pottery   ✓
Metal   ✗
Metalworking   ✗
Human Bones   ✗
Animal Bones   ✗
Lithics   ✓
Environmental   ✓
Other   ✗

Aerial

None

Interior Features (Aerial):
APs Not Checked   ✓
None   ✗
Roundhouses   ✗
Rectangular Structures   ✗
Pits   ✗
Postholes   ✗
Roads/Tracks   ✗
Other   ✗

Entrances

Several gaps of later downland tracks and paths cross the monument; original entrance not determined.

Total Number of Breaks Through Ramparts:  
None:   Several gaps of later downland tracks and paths cross the monument - number not defined.

Number of Possible Original Entrances:  
2:   Original entrance not determined.

Guard Chambers:  ✗

Chevaux de Frise:  ✗

Entrances:No related records

Enclosing Works

Simple rampart, to c. 1m high, above generally infilled ditch, c. 3m wide and to 0.5m deep, follow contours on E and NW sides. Most of S part reduced or lost to ploughing. On N steep natural slopes make artificial defences unnecessary.

Enclosed Area:
Area 1:   7.0ha.
Total:   7.0ha.

Total Footprint Area:  Noneha.

Ramparts

None

Multi-period Enclosure System:
✗   None

Ramparts Form a Continuous Circuit:
✓   To S rampart largely reduced or destroyed by ploughing.

Number of Ramparts:  
NE Quadrant:   1
SE Quadrant:   1
SW Quadrant:   1
NW Quadrant:   1
Total:   1

Morphology

Current Morphology:
Partial Univallate   ✗
Univallate   ✓
Partial Bivallate   ✗
Bivallate   ✗
Partial Multivallate   ✗
Multivallate   ✗
Unknown   ✗

Detailed Morphology:
Partial Univallate   ✗
Univallate   ✗
Partial Bivallate   ✗
Bivallate   ✗
Partial Multivallate   ✗
Multivallate   ✗

Surface Evidence

Probably chalk rubble.

Enclosing Works (Surface):
None   ✗
Earthen Bank   ✓
Stone Wall   ✗
Rubble   ✗
Wall-walk   ✗
Evidence of Timber   ✗
Vitrification   ✗
Other Burning   ✗
Palisade   ✗
Counter Scarp Bank   ✗
Berm   ✗
Unfinished   ✗
Other   ✗

Excavated Evidence

None

Enclosing Works (Excavation):
None   ✓
Earthen Bank   ✗
Stone Wall   ✗
Murus Duplex   ✗
Timber-framed   ✗
Timber-laced   ✗
Vitrification   ✗
Other Burning   ✗
Palisade   ✗
Counter Scarp Bank   ✗
Berm   ✗
Unfinished   ✗
No Known Excavation   ✗
Other   ✗

Other

Gang Working:
✗   None

Ditches:
✓   None

Number of Ditches:  1

Annex:
✗   None

References

Allcroft, A.H. 1908. Earthwork of England : prehistoric, Roman, Saxon, Danish, Norman, and mediaeval, London: Macmillann, 667-69.

Bannister, N. The National Trust Annual Archaeological Review, 9, 2000-2001.

Butler, C. 2001. Ditchling Beacon Enclosure: survey and trial trenching, Mid Sussex Field Archaeological Team assessment and evaluation report.

Crow, D.A. 1930. Excavations at Ditchling Beacon, Sussex Archaeol Collect. 71, 259-61.

Hamilton, S. and Manley, J.1997. Points of view. Prominent enclosures in 1st millennium Sussex, Sussex Archaeol Coll, 135, 93-112.

Hamilton, S. and Manley, J. 2001. Hillforts, monumentality and place: a chronological and topographic review of first millennium BC hillforts of southeast England, European J Archaeol, 4.1, 7-42.



Terms of Use

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 and should be cited as:

Lock, Gary and Ralston, Ian. 2024. Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland. Available at: https://hillforts.arch.ox.ac.uk


Document Version 1.1