Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland

EN3773 Castle Hill, Fort I, Kent (Castle Hill Camp; Capel Castle Hill)

LiDAR 1m DTM Hillshade

LiDAR 1m DTM Hillshade

Satellite Imagery

Satellite Imagery

Scroll left/right to view further images.

HER:  Kent MKE1116 (None)

NMR:  TQ 64 SW 1 (412408)

SM:  1005191

NGR:  TQ 60825 43922

X:  560825  Y:  143922  (OSGB36)

Summary

Within a clearing on the south-eastern edge of Castle Hill Wood and to the W of Castle Hill Road, two Iron Age contour forts. They are located at 125m OD on a spur of high ground overlooking the Weald. The site was excavated by Winbolt in 1929 who considered it to be a single enclosure with damage occurring to ramparts the NW and SE. Later investigated in 1959 by E. Geary of the Archaeology Division of the Ordnance Survey who concluded the remains were of two distinctly separate contour forts. This was investigated further between 1969-71 (Money 1975) where the sites are described as Fort I and II. Fort II is recorded under Atlas No. 3857. Fort I is oval in form but now damaged or incomplete and in the region of 1.2ha in size lying on the brow of the spur. Extant in the N and E but destroyed elsewhere with the ditch now filled in. Probing showed that the ramparts continued in areas where no surface remains existed. A trench placed across the defences in the N showed it comprised two banks with a medial ditch. The inner bank, which stood at 0.84m high, was originally between 4.57-5.48m wide, and composed of clay and small sandstones. The V-shaped ditch was 8.23m wide and 3.65m deep but silted-up with material from the eroding bank. Two bands of humic soils across the ditch showed where a hiatus had occurred in the silting processes. The outer bank was 9.14m wide and 1.82m high. Charcoal scattered across the old land surface suggested burning of the undergrowth prior to the rampart construction. This gave a radiocarbon date of c.315 BC. A single posthole and a number of depressions, interpreted as being for a palisade, were discovered in section descending from the crest of the rampart. Magnetic susceptibility measurements from the ditch silts and lack of archaeological material suggest the site was occupied only for a short time. An entrance lies in the E approached by a trackway approximately 36.5m long and 10m wide paved with ironstone. The northern terminal of the entrance was wider than that in the S by 4.5m (Winbolt 1929, 193) as shown on a later plan by Money (1975, 68). Forestry activities have damaged the earthworks to the S of the entrance. At the inner part of the entrance, large postholes, 0.2m and 0.25m in diameter set 3m apart on either side of the entrance, sunk to a depth of 0.45m and packed with earth and stone were interpreted as gate posts (Money 1975, 70-1). From further postholes in this location it was suggested they were possibly the uprights for a bridge. Further excavation in the ditch to the S of the entrance produced large numbers of revetting stones and burnt timbers, including planks beams stakes and a strut, tumbled from the inner rampart. The outer entrance also produced evidence for post and stake holes. Smaller excavations within the interior of both sites recorded little in the way of occupation material. It was concluded that both forts had a brief occupation with Fort II replacing Fort I after its destruction. There was possibly a hiatus following the destruction of Fort I when farming might have taken place on the hilltop. The site is recorded on 1909 1:10,560 OS mapping. Scheduled

Status

Citizen Science:  ✗

Reliability of Data:  Confirmed

Reliability of Interpretation:  Confirmed

Location

X:  33303  Y:  6651751  (EPSG: 3857)

Longitude:  0.2991687166611829  Latitude:  51.171866208113904  (EPSG:4326)

Country:  England

Current County or Unitary Authority:  Kent

Historic County:  Kent

Current Parish/Community/Council/Townland:  Capel

Monument Condition

None

Condition:
Extant   ✓
Cropmark   ✗
Likely Destroyed   ✓

Land Use

None

Current Use:
Woodland   ✓
Commercial Forestry Plantation   ✗
Parkland   ✗
Pasture (Grazing)   ✗
Arable   ✓
Scrub/Bracken   ✗
Bare Outcrop   ✗
Heather/Moorland   ✗
Heath   ✗
Built-up   ✗
Coastal Grassland   ✗
Other   ✗

Landscape

Hillfort Type

A contour fort lying on a level sandstone spur at 125m OD

Type:
Contour Fort   ✓
Partial Contour Fort   ✗
Promontory Fort   ✗
Hillslope Fort   ✗
Level Terrain Fort   ✗
Marsh Fort   ✗
Multiple Enclosure Fort   ✗

Topographic Position

Position:
Hilltop   ✓
Coastal Promontory   ✗
Inland Promontory   ✗
Valley Bottom   ✗
Knoll/Hillock/Outcrop   ✗
Ridge   ✗
Cliff/Plateau-edge/Scarp   ✗
Hillslope   ✗
Lowland   ✗
Spur   ✓

Dominant Topographic Feature:  Sandstone spur

Aspect:
North   ✗
Northeast   ✗
East   ✗
Southeast   ✗
South   ✗
Southwest   ✗
West   ✗
Northwest   ✗
Level   ✓

Altitude:  125.0m

Boundary

N/A


Dating Evidence

Radiocarbon dates were obtained from charcoal from clearance of the old land surface. Dated c. 315 BC. Small amounts of pottery dated to the pre-Roman Iron Age.

Reliability:  B - Medium

Principal Activity:
Pre 1200BC   ✗
1200BC - 800BC   ✗
800BC - 400BC   ✗
400BC - AD50   ✓
AD50 - AD400   ✗
AD400 - AD 800   ✗
Post AD800   ✗
Unknown   ✗

Other Activity:
Pre Hillfort:   None
Post Hillfort:   None

Evidence:
Artefactual:   None
C14:   None

Investigation History

Possibly in Aubrey's Monumenta Britannica (1665-1693). Recorded on 1909 1:10,560 OS mapping. OS field survey 1959. Excavated in 1929 (Winbolt 1929) and 1969-71 (Money 1975). Watching brief in 1965. Scheduled

Investigations:
1st Identified Map Depiction (1900):   None
Excavation (1929):   None
Other (1959):   Field survey
Other (1965):   Watching Brief
1st Identified Written Reference (None):   None
Excavation (None):   None
Other (None):   Magnetic Susceptibility
Other (None):   Scheduled

Interior Features

Burning across the interior prior to construction. Little evidence for occupation

Water Source

None

Source:
None   ✓
Spring   ✗
Stream   ✗
Pool   ✗
Flush   ✗
Well   ✗
Other   ✗

Surface

None

Interior Features (Surface):
No Known Features   ✓
Round Stone Structures   ✗
Rectangular Stone Structures   ✗
Curvilinear Platforms   ✗
Other Roundhouse Evidence   ✗
Pits   ✗
Quarry Hollows   ✗
Other   ✗

Excavation

Burning prior to construction

Interior Features (Excavation):
No Known Excavation   ✗
Pits   ✗
Postholes   ✗
Roundhouses   ✗
Rectangular Structures   ✗
Roads/Tracks   ✗
Quarry Hollows   ✗
Other   ✓
Nothing Found   ✗

Geophysics

Magnetic susceptibility

Interior Features (Geophysics):
No Known Geophysics   ✗
Pits   ✗
Roundhouses   ✗
Rectangular Structures   ✗
Roads/Tracks   ✗
Quarry Hollows   ✗
Other   ✗
Nothing Found   ✓

Finds

Mesolithic flints, Neolithic sherds

Interior (Finds):
No Known Finds   ✗
Pottery   ✓
Metal   ✗
Metalworking   ✗
Human Bones   ✗
Animal Bones   ✗
Lithics   ✓
Environmental   ✗
Other   ✗

Aerial

None

Interior Features (Aerial):
APs Not Checked   ✓
None   ✗
Roundhouses   ✗
Rectangular Structures   ✗
Pits   ✗
Postholes   ✗
Roads/Tracks   ✗
Other   ✗

Entrances

An entrance lies in the E approached by a trackway approximately 36.5m long and 10m wide paved with ironstone. The northern terminal of the entrance was wider than that in the S by 4.5m (Winbolt 1929, 193) as shown on a later plan by Money (1975, 68). At the inner part of the entrance, large postholes,0.2m and 0.25m in diameter set 3m apart on either side of the entrance, were interpreted as gate posts sunk to a depth of 0.45m and packed with earth and stone (Money 1975, 70-1). From further postholes in this location it was suggested they were possibly the uprights for a bridge.

Total Number of Breaks Through Ramparts:  
4:   Breaks through inner and outer rampart

Number of Possible Original Entrances:  
2:   None

Guard Chambers:  ✗

Chevaux de Frise:  ✗

Entrances:
1. Simple Gap (East):   None
2. Simple Gap (East):   None

Enclosing Works

Oval in form but now damaged or incomplete, in the region of 1.2ha. Extant in the N and E but destroyed elsewhere with the ditch now filled in. Probing showed that the ramparts continued in areas where no surface remains existed. It comprised two banks with a medial ditch. The inner bank which stood at 0.84m high, was originally between 4.57-5.48m wide, and composed of clay and small sandstones. The V-shaped ditch was 8.23m wide and 3.65m deep but silted-up with material from the eroding bank. Two bands of humic soils across the ditch showed where a hiatus had occurred in the silting processes. The outer bank was 9.14m wide and 1.82m high. This gave a radiocarbon date of c.315 BC. A single posthole and a number of depressions, interpreted as being for a palisade, discovered in the crest of the rampart. Further excavation in the ditch to the S of the entrance produced large numbers of revetting stones and burnt timbers, including planks, beams, stakes and a strut, tumbled from the inner rampart. The outer bank is possibly a counterscarp

Enclosed Area:
Area 1:   1.2ha.
Total:   1.2ha.

Total Footprint Area:  Noneha.

Ramparts

None

Multi-period Enclosure System:
✗   None

Ramparts Form a Continuous Circuit:
✓   None

Number of Ramparts:  
NE Quadrant:   2
SE Quadrant:   2
SW Quadrant:   2
NW Quadrant:   2
Total:   2

Morphology

Current Morphology:
Partial Univallate   ✗
Univallate   ✗
Partial Bivallate   ✗
Bivallate   ✓
Partial Multivallate   ✗
Multivallate   ✗
Unknown   ✗

Detailed Morphology:
Partial Univallate   ✗
Univallate   ✗
Partial Bivallate   ✗
Bivallate   ✗
Partial Multivallate   ✗
Multivallate   ✗

Surface Evidence

None

Enclosing Works (Surface):
None   ✗
Earthen Bank   ✓
Stone Wall   ✗
Rubble   ✗
Wall-walk   ✗
Evidence of Timber   ✗
Vitrification   ✗
Other Burning   ✗
Palisade   ✗
Counter Scarp Bank   ✓
Berm   ✗
Unfinished   ✗
Other   ✗

Excavated Evidence

Stone fragments and sand. The outer bank is possibly a counterscarp

Enclosing Works (Excavation):
None   ✗
Earthen Bank   ✓
Stone Wall   ✓
Murus Duplex   ✗
Timber-framed   ✗
Timber-laced   ✗
Vitrification   ✗
Other Burning   ✓
Palisade   ✓
Counter Scarp Bank   ✓
Berm   ✗
Unfinished   ✗
No Known Excavation   ✗
Other   ✓

Other

Gang Working:
✗   None

Ditches:
✓   None

Number of Ditches:  1

Annex:
✗   None

References

Money, J.H. 1975. Excavations in the two Iron-Age Hill-Forts Castle Hill, Capel, Near Tonbridge 1965 and 1969-71. Archaeol Cantiana, 91, 61-85

Winbolt, S.E. 1929. Castle Hill Camp Tonbridge. Archaeol Cantiana, 41, 193-5



Terms of Use

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 and should be cited as:

Lock, Gary and Ralston, Ian. 2024. Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland. Available at: https://hillforts.arch.ox.ac.uk


Document Version 1.1