Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland

SC4192 Brough of Stoal, Aywick, Shetland (Yell, Aywick, Brough of Stoal; The Snuti)

Satellite Imagery

Satellite Imagery

HER:  Shetland Amenity Trust 2170 (None)

NMR:  HU 58 NW 1 (1363)

SM:  2085

NGR:  HU 5455 8730

X:  454550  Y:  1187300  (OSGB36)

Summary

The Brough of Stoal is situated on a precipitous promontory which is under active erosion. Usually interpreted as the site of a broch with outworks, Raymond Lamb was not convinced that the complex of stone structures that he observed in the remaining fragment of the interior necessarily included a broch (1980, 84), thus identifying it as the remains of a promontory fort with a spectacular belt of defences barring access across the neck on the NNW. Some 25m in depth, the belt comprises at least three ramparts and ditches, while Lamb also noted on the cliff-edge on the ENE the possible remains of a low bank on the counterscarp of the shallow outer ditch (Lamb 1980. 48, fig 17). The ramparts are impressive, rising over 2m in height above the bottoms of the adjacent ditches, and the middle rampart to as much as 3.7m in height, but they are not necessarily all contemporary and the third is clearly set at angle to the inner two, its line splaying towards the NE. The entrance does not survive, and presumably approached across the neck on the NNW along either the ENE or WSW margin. Within the interior, which has been reduced to an area measuring no more than 32m in length from NNW to SSE by 15m transversely (0.04ha), there is a mound of grass-grown rubble, but whether this is includes the remains of a broch or is some other structure can only be demonstrated by excavation.

Status

Citizen Science:  ✗

Reliability of Data:  Confirmed

Reliability of Interpretation:  Confirmed

Location

X:  -112070  Y:  8526762  (EPSG: 3857)

Longitude:  -1.0067427590745976  Latitude:  60.565639068829256  (EPSG:4326)

Country:  Scotland

Current County or Unitary Authority:  Shetland Islands

Historic County:  Shetland

Current Parish/Community/Council/Townland:  Yell

Monument Condition

Active marine erosion

Condition:
Extant   ✓
Cropmark   ✗
Likely Destroyed   ✗

Land Use

None

Current Use:
Woodland   ✗
Commercial Forestry Plantation   ✗
Parkland   ✗
Pasture (Grazing)   ✓
Arable   ✗
Scrub/Bracken   ✗
Bare Outcrop   ✗
Heather/Moorland   ✓
Heath   ✗
Built-up   ✗
Coastal Grassland   ✗
Other   ✗

Landscape

Hillfort Type

None

Type:
Contour Fort   ✗
Partial Contour Fort   ✗
Promontory Fort   ✓
Hillslope Fort   ✗
Level Terrain Fort   ✗
Marsh Fort   ✗
Multiple Enclosure Fort   ✗

Topographic Position

Position:
Hilltop   ✗
Coastal Promontory   ✓
Inland Promontory   ✗
Valley Bottom   ✗
Knoll/Hillock/Outcrop   ✗
Ridge   ✗
Cliff/Plateau-edge/Scarp   ✗
Hillslope   ✗
Lowland   ✗
Spur   ✗

Dominant Topographic Feature:  None

Aspect:
North   ✗
Northeast   ✗
East   ✗
Southeast   ✗
South   ✗
Southwest   ✗
West   ✗
Northwest   ✗
Level   ✓

Altitude:  20.0m

Boundary

N/A


Dating Evidence

In the absence of excavation, there are neither stratified artefacts nor radiocarbon dates to provide a chronology for the defences.

Reliability:  D - None

Principal Activity:
Pre 1200BC   ✗
1200BC - 800BC   ✗
800BC - 400BC   ✗
400BC - AD50   ✗
AD50 - AD400   ✗
AD400 - AD 800   ✗
Post AD800   ✗
Unknown   ✓

Other Activity:
Pre Hillfort:   None
Post Hillfort:   Active marine erosion

Evidence:No related records

Investigation History

Photographed by RCAHMS Aerial Survey Programme in 2014

Investigations:
1st Identified Map Depiction (1878):   Annotated Brough on the 1st edition OS 6-inch map (Shetland 1882, sheet 16)
Other (1931):   Description (RCAHMS 1946, iii, 161-2, no.1717)
Other (1934):   Scheduled
Other (1969):   Visited by the OS
Other (1970):   Plan and description by Raymond Lamb (1980, 48 fig 17, 84)
Other (2012):   Re-Scheduled

Interior Features

Stone structures, usually thought to include a broch, though Raymond Lamb was of the opinion that these were not the remains of a broch (1980, 84)

Water Source

None

Source:
None   ✓
Spring   ✗
Stream   ✗
Pool   ✗
Flush   ✗
Well   ✗
Other   ✗

Surface

Complex of stone structures or possible broch

Interior Features (Surface):
No Known Features   ✗
Round Stone Structures   ✗
Rectangular Stone Structures   ✗
Curvilinear Platforms   ✗
Other Roundhouse Evidence   ✗
Pits   ✗
Quarry Hollows   ✗
Other   ✓

Excavation

None

Interior Features (Excavation):
No Known Excavation   ✓
Pits   ✗
Postholes   ✗
Roundhouses   ✗
Rectangular Structures   ✗
Roads/Tracks   ✗
Quarry Hollows   ✗
Other   ✗
Nothing Found   ✗

Geophysics

None

Interior Features (Geophysics):
No Known Geophysics   ✓
Pits   ✗
Roundhouses   ✗
Rectangular Structures   ✗
Roads/Tracks   ✗
Quarry Hollows   ✗
Other   ✗
Nothing Found   ✗

Finds

None

Interior (Finds):
No Known Finds   ✓
Pottery   ✗
Metal   ✗
Metalworking   ✗
Human Bones   ✗
Animal Bones   ✗
Lithics   ✗
Environmental   ✗
Other   ✗

Aerial

Mess of rubble

Interior Features (Aerial):
APs Not Checked   ✗
None   ✗
Roundhouses   ✗
Rectangular Structures   ✗
Pits   ✗
Postholes   ✗
Roads/Tracks   ✗
Other   ✓

Entrances

Must have approached across the neck from the NNW

Total Number of Breaks Through Ramparts:  
0:   None

Number of Possible Original Entrances:  
2:   Must have approached across the neck from the NNW

Guard Chambers:  ✗

Chevaux de Frise:  ✗

Entrances:No related records

Enclosing Works

At least three ramparts and ditches cutting off a precipitous promontory

Enclosed Area:
Area 1:   0.04ha.
Total:   0.04ha.

Total Footprint Area:  Noneha.

Ramparts

None

Multi-period Enclosure System:
✓   Divergent lines of the ramparts suggests they may represent several periods of construction

Ramparts Form a Continuous Circuit:
✗   Also a possible additional fragment of a counterscarp rampart

Number of Ramparts:  
NE Quadrant:   0
SE Quadrant:   0
SW Quadrant:   0
NW Quadrant:   3
Total:   3

Morphology

Current Morphology:
Partial Univallate   ✗
Univallate   ✗
Partial Bivallate   ✗
Bivallate   ✗
Partial Multivallate   ✓
Multivallate   ✗
Unknown   ✗

Detailed Morphology:
Partial Univallate   ✗
Univallate   ✗
Partial Bivallate   ✗
Bivallate   ✗
Partial Multivallate   ✗
Multivallate   ✗

Surface Evidence

None

Enclosing Works (Surface):
None   ✗
Earthen Bank   ✓
Stone Wall   ✗
Rubble   ✗
Wall-walk   ✗
Evidence of Timber   ✗
Vitrification   ✗
Other Burning   ✗
Palisade   ✗
Counter Scarp Bank   ✓
Berm   ✗
Unfinished   ✗
Other   ✗

Excavated Evidence

None

Enclosing Works (Excavation):
None   ✗
Earthen Bank   ✗
Stone Wall   ✗
Murus Duplex   ✗
Timber-framed   ✗
Timber-laced   ✗
Vitrification   ✗
Other Burning   ✗
Palisade   ✗
Counter Scarp Bank   ✗
Berm   ✗
Unfinished   ✗
No Known Excavation   ✓
Other   ✗

Other

Gang Working:
✗   None

Ditches:
✓   None

Number of Ditches:  3

Annex:
✗   None

References

Lamb, R G (1980) Iron Age promontory forts in the Northern Isles. Brit Archaeol Rep, British Ser 79. BAR: Oxford

RCAHMS (1946) The Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland. Twelfth report with an inventory of the ancient monuments of Orkney and Shetland, 3v. HMSO: Edinburgh



Terms of Use

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 and should be cited as:

Lock, Gary and Ralston, Ian. 2024. Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland. Available at: https://hillforts.arch.ox.ac.uk


Document Version 1.1