Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland

WA4353 Coed-y-Caerau Enclosure Complex, Monmouthshire

LiDAR 1m DTM Hillshade

LiDAR 1m DTM Hillshade

Satellite Imagery

Satellite Imagery

Scroll left/right to view further images.

HER:  Glamorgan Gwent 00414g; 00415g; 00416g (None)

NMR:  ST 39 SE 39 (307891)

SM:  None

NGR:  ST37899155

X:  337822  Y:  191512  (OSGB36)

Summary

Three bivallate or univallate co-joined contour enclosure complex located on summit of a steep ridge above lower Usk. Steep wooded surrounding slopes to NW, less to SE. SW site is a part bivallate enclosure (Coed-y-Caerau) roughly oval and c. 84m-94m in diameter, with internal area estimated at 0.8ha. Single bank with traces of outer circuit on S and SW and possible ploughed-out bank and ditch to far SW, but unclear. Original inturned entrance possibly to SE, that on SW possibly later, but unclear. Sub-circular, bivallate, middle enclosure (Pen Toppen Ash Camp) possibly part-built over Coed-y-Caerau, c. 74m-80m diameter, with internal area estimated at 0.6ha, with partial bank within seemingly concentric outer embanked enclosure, that emerges from the SW enclosure circuit, c. 136m-142m in diameter and internal area c. 1.9ha, counterscarped on NW. Inturned entrances on NE and SE. Third enclosure on NE suggested as Roman fortlet, but may have Iron Age connotations. This is rectangular, c. 96m NE-SW by 108m, with internal area c. 1ha. Defined by single bank with an outer, concentric c. 166m square. Possible further related earthworks to N and W. Generally well-preserved. Upland pasture. Pen-toppen-ash Camp on 1st Ed. OS map (1882). Questions remain as to the nature of these enclosures.

Status

Citizen Science:  ✗

Reliability of Data:  Unconfirmed

Reliability of Interpretation:  Confirmed

Location

X:  -322774  Y:  6731515  (EPSG: 3857)

Longitude:  -2.8995251137054696  Latitude:  51.61893554285026  (EPSG:4326)

Country:  Wales; None

Current County or Unitary Authority:  Newport

Historic County:  Monmouthshire

Current Parish/Community/Council/Townland:  Langstone; Kemeys Inferior

Monument Condition

Generally well-preserved, but plough damage, particularly to middle enclosure reduced banks.

Condition:
Extant   ✓
Cropmark   ✗
Likely Destroyed   ✗

Land Use

Upland pasture

Current Use:
Woodland   ✗
Commercial Forestry Plantation   ✗
Parkland   ✗
Pasture (Grazing)   ✓
Arable   ✗
Scrub/Bracken   ✗
Bare Outcrop   ✗
Heather/Moorland   ✗
Heath   ✗
Built-up   ✗
Coastal Grassland   ✗
Other   ✗

Landscape

Hillfort Type

Three co-joined enclosure complex located on summit of a steep ridge above lower Usk. Steep wooded surrounding slopes to NW, less to SE.

Type:
Contour Fort   ✓
Partial Contour Fort   ✗
Promontory Fort   ✗
Hillslope Fort   ✗
Level Terrain Fort   ✗
Marsh Fort   ✗
Multiple Enclosure Fort   ✗

Topographic Position

Position:
Hilltop   ✓
Coastal Promontory   ✗
Inland Promontory   ✗
Valley Bottom   ✗
Knoll/Hillock/Outcrop   ✗
Ridge   ✓
Cliff/Plateau-edge/Scarp   ✗
Hillslope   ✗
Lowland   ✗
Spur   ✗

Dominant Topographic Feature:  Hill top ridge

Aspect:
North   ✗
Northeast   ✗
East   ✗
Southeast   ✗
South   ✗
Southwest   ✗
West   ✗
Northwest   ✗
Level   ✓

Altitude:  192.0m

Boundary

Boundary Type:  Parish/Townland


Dating Evidence

Possibly Iron Age, but NE enclosure suggested as Roman fortlet and many questions remain.

Reliability:  C - Low

Principal Activity:
Pre 1200BC   ✗
1200BC - 800BC   ✗
800BC - 400BC   ✗
400BC - AD50   ✓
AD50 - AD400   ✓
AD400 - AD 800   ✗
Post AD800   ✗
Unknown   ✗

Other Activity:
Pre Hillfort:   None
Post Hillfort:   None

Evidence:
Morphology/Earthwork/Typology:   NE enclosure suggested as Roman fortlet.

Investigation History

Pen-toppen-ash Camp on 1st Ed. OS map (1882). Geophysical survey D. Roberts 2005. Field visit GGAT 2006. GGAT Prehistoric defended enclosures Gwent 2006.

Investigations:
1st Identified Map Depiction (1882):   Pen-toppen-ash Camp on 1st Ed. OS map.
Geophysical Survey (2005):   D. Roberts.
Other (2006):   Field visit GGAT.
Other (2006):   GGAT Prehistoric defended enclosures Gwent.

Interior Features

Surface and geophysical evidence of hut circles to middle enclosure.

Water Source

None

Source:
None   ✓
Spring   ✗
Stream   ✗
Pool   ✗
Flush   ✗
Well   ✗
Other   ✗

Surface

Evidence of two hut circles in middle enclosure.

Interior Features (Surface):
No Known Features   ✓
Round Stone Structures   ✗
Rectangular Stone Structures   ✗
Curvilinear Platforms   ✗
Other Roundhouse Evidence   ✓
Pits   ✗
Quarry Hollows   ✗
Other   ✗

Excavation

None

Interior Features (Excavation):
No Known Excavation   ✓
Pits   ✗
Postholes   ✗
Roundhouses   ✗
Rectangular Structures   ✗
Roads/Tracks   ✗
Quarry Hollows   ✗
Other   ✗
Nothing Found   ✗

Geophysics

Possible evidence of huts in interior found in middle enclosure.

Interior Features (Geophysics):
No Known Geophysics   ✗
Pits   ✗
Roundhouses   ✓
Rectangular Structures   ✗
Roads/Tracks   ✗
Quarry Hollows   ✗
Other   ✗
Nothing Found   ✗

Finds

None

Interior (Finds):
No Known Finds   ✓
Pottery   ✗
Metal   ✗
Metalworking   ✗
Human Bones   ✗
Animal Bones   ✗
Lithics   ✗
Environmental   ✗
Other   ✗

Aerial

None

Interior Features (Aerial):
APs Not Checked   ✓
None   ✗
Roundhouses   ✗
Rectangular Structures   ✗
Pits   ✗
Postholes   ✗
Roads/Tracks   ✗
Other   ✗

Entrances

SW enclosure possible inturned entrance on SE, that on SW possibly later. Middle enclosure has inturned entrances on NE and SW. Entrance to NE enclosure unclear.

Total Number of Breaks Through Ramparts:  
4:   SW entrance to SW enclosure possibly later.

Number of Possible Original Entrances:  
2:   None

Guard Chambers:  ✗

Chevaux de Frise:  ✗

Entrances:
1. In-turned (South east):   Entrance to SW enclosure.
2. In-turned (North east):   Entrance to middle enclosure.
3. In-turned (South east):   Entrance to middle enclosure.

Enclosing Works

SW enclosure defined by single bank and traces of outer circuit on S and SW. Sub-circular middle enclosure with partial bank within seemingly concentric outer embanked enclosure, that emerges from the SW enclosure circuit. Part counterscarped. Third enclosure on NE suggested as Roman fortlet, but may have Iron Age connotations. This is rectangular, c. 96m NE-SW by 108m, with internal area c. 1ha. Defined by single bank with an outer, concentric c. 166m square.

Enclosed Area:
Area 1:   0.8ha.
Area 2:   1.9ha.
Area 3:   1ha.
Total:   1.9ha.

Total Footprint Area:  Noneha.

Ramparts

None

Multi-period Enclosure System:
✓   Three co-joined enclosures. SW c. 0.8ha. Middle c. 1.9ha. NE c. 1ha. Estimates only. Possibly built in succession, but conjecture only.

Ramparts Form a Continuous Circuit:
✗   Three co-joined enclosures. Only SW enclosure (Coed-y-Caerau) quadrants defined.

Number of Ramparts:  
NE Quadrant:   1
SE Quadrant:   2
SW Quadrant:   2
NW Quadrant:   1
Total:   2

Morphology

Current Morphology:
Partial Univallate   ✓
Univallate   ✗
Partial Bivallate   ✓
Bivallate   ✗
Partial Multivallate   ✗
Multivallate   ✗
Unknown   ✗

Detailed Morphology:
Partial Univallate   ✗
Univallate   ✗
Partial Bivallate   ✗
Bivallate   ✗
Partial Multivallate   ✗
Multivallate   ✗

Surface Evidence

Middle enclosure part counterscarped.

Enclosing Works (Surface):
None   ✗
Earthen Bank   ✓
Stone Wall   ✗
Rubble   ✗
Wall-walk   ✗
Evidence of Timber   ✗
Vitrification   ✗
Other Burning   ✗
Palisade   ✗
Counter Scarp Bank   ✓
Berm   ✗
Unfinished   ✗
Other   ✗

Excavated Evidence

None

Enclosing Works (Excavation):
None   ✗
Earthen Bank   ✗
Stone Wall   ✗
Murus Duplex   ✗
Timber-framed   ✗
Timber-laced   ✗
Vitrification   ✗
Other Burning   ✗
Palisade   ✗
Counter Scarp Bank   ✗
Berm   ✗
Unfinished   ✗
No Known Excavation   ✓
Other   ✗

Other

Gang Working:
✗   None

Ditches:
✗   No details, but sites probably ditched.

Number of Ditches:  0

Annex:
✗   None

References

Wiggins, H. 2006. Prehistoric defended enclosures in Gwent, GGAT.



Terms of Use

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 and should be cited as:

Lock, Gary and Ralston, Ian. 2024. Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland. Available at: https://hillforts.arch.ox.ac.uk


Document Version 1.1